Epstein Secrets

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joscha Bach <, Subject: Re: Decision making Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:23:10 +0000 luck plays a role. 2, looking back ( bayesian ) might not tell you anthing a

communication and negotiation? Is there are general approach, or how much should theories of decision making be dependent on the domain? Cheers, Joscha please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information

stic descriptions in a highly complex world, where we cannot observe baseline probabilities anyway. How do you decide? Do you Solomonoff-induce and Bayes the hell out of the stock market, do you reason, do you soak up data and let your intuitions guide you, or is most of the important stuff depending

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joscha Bach Subject: Re: Decision making Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:39:10 +0000 probablities vs similiarities. I suggest you take care with the concept of prob

and negotiation? Is there are general approach, or how much should theories of decision making be dependent on the domain? Cheers, EFTA00847826 Joscha please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information

stic descriptions in a highly complex world, where we cannot observe baseline probabilities anyway. How do you decide? Do you Solomonoff-induce and Bayes the hell out of the stock market, do you reason, do you soak up data and let your intuitions guide you, or is most of the important stuff depending

From: Joscha Bach To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Decision making Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:26:59 +0000 1. Does luck mean gambling, or gett

communication and negotiation? Is there are general approach, or how much should theories of decision making be dependent on the domain? Cheers, Joscha EFTA00847823 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute ins

stic descriptions in a highly complex world, where we cannot observe baseline probabilities anyway. How do you decide? Do you Solomonoff-induce and Bayes the hell out of the stock market, do you reason, do you soak up data and let your intuitions guide you, or is most of the important stuff depending

From: Joscha Bach < Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 7:45 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Decision making Re motivation: Have you seen the recent movie "Ex Mach

istic descriptions in a =ighly complex world, where we cannot observe baseline probabilities =nyway. How do you decide? Do you Solomonoff-induce and Bayes the hell out of =he stock market, do you reason, do you soak up data and let your =ntuitions guide you, or is most of the important stuff depending

ocedure Node: A Schemallode or PredicateNode • Psi: A model of motivated action and emotion, originated by Dietrich Dorner and further developed by Joscha Bach, who incorporated it in his proto-AGI system MicroPsi. OpenCog- Prime's motivated-action component, OpenPsi, is roughly based on the Psi model. • Ps

ation that could potentially be done faster if a lot of the probabilistic knowledge from the AtomSpace were summarized in a Bayes Net. Updating the Bayes net structure can be slow, so this is probably not appropriate for knowledge that is rapidly shifting; but knowledge about properties of blocks str