Epstein Secrets

brred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government witnesses (such as Tatum Miller. Brittany Beale, Saige Gonzalez, and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: rips!, there was no communication, telephonic or othcnvisc, that meets the requirements of § 2422(b). For in

5/obb Sow See issioN To ME 1* EXHIBIT 8-33 EFTA00224786 cool 06/02/08 1ION 14:58 FAX 305 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of*Florida UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 99 NE 41" STREET MIAMI, FLORID

eterred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government wimesses (such as Tatum Miller. Brittany Beak, Saige Gonzalez. and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: First, there was no communication, telephonic or otherwise, that meets the requirements of § 2422(b). Par in

e the Slate Attorney of l'alen peach tu issue a criminal in !brit union EFTA00225692 uoiuzive AWN 14:3a /AA 305 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE (moot U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 99 NE 4Th STREET MIAMI, FLORID

654-4889 [email protected] May 19, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (202) 514-0467 CONFIDENTIAL Honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C, 20530 Dear Judge Filip: | In his confirmation hearings last fall, Judge Mukasey admirably lifted up

s on the appropriate reach of federal law. However, we respectfully submit that a full review of all the facts is urgently needed at senior levels of the Justice Department. In an effort to inform you of the nature of the federal investigation against Mr, Epstein, we summarize the facts and circumstances of this matter b

deferred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government witnesses (such as Tatum Miller, Brittany Beale, Saige Gonzalez, and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: First, there was no communication, telephonic or otherwise, that meets the requirements of § 2422(b). For ins