Epstein Secrets

be both (1) testimonial and (2) incriminating ."). Later in his Reply, in order to avoid the clear similarity between this case and United States v. Hunter , Epstein goes out of his way to assert that the computers are not incriminating. Epstein argues: "Unlike a murder weapon or bank robbery proceeds,

Telephonel Facsimile: I Attorney for United States William L. Richey, Esq. William L. Richey P.A Miami, Fl Telephon Facsimile: Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via U.S. Mail Black, Srebnick, Koms an & Stum f, P.A. Miami, FL 33131 Telephon Facsimile Attorney or n e

tes in evaluating that claim, but Epstein has objected to the production of those documents. F.I 1Although unpublished, the case of United States v. Hunter , 1995 WL 12513 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 1995), contains facts similar to the ones at bar and gives a detailed analysis of the applicability of the attorn

torney for United States EFTA00211798 William L. Richey, Esq. William L. Richey P.A. Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone l Facsimile: Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via Federal Express Roy Black, Esq. Black Srebnick, Koms an & Stum f, P.A. Miami, FL 33131 Telephone l F

tates in evaluating that claim, but Epstein has objected to the production of those documents. F.I 1Although unpublished, the case of United States' Hunter , 1995 WL 12513 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 1995), contains facts similar to the ones at bar and gives a detailed analysis of the applicability of the attorn

strict Court, Southern District of Florida Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for United States EFTA00223014 William L. Richey, Esq. Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via Federal Express Roy Black, Esq. Attorney for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein Service via Hand Delivery aRi