Epstein Secrets

18 U.S.C. 5 3593(c). Because Fell preserved his objection to this testimony at trial, we review this eviden- tiary ruling for abuse of discretion. Yousef 327 F.3d at 156. [39[40](41] No abuse of discretion oc- curred here. First, although Fell claims that his mother's statement was too attenuated t

. Florida Bar No. 0042201 23 EFTA00177962 Page I of 55 Westlaw Page I 531 F.3d 197 (Cite as: 531 F.3d 197) United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. UNITED STATES America, Appellee, Donald FELL, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 06-2882-cr. Argued: June 27, 2007. Decided: June 27, 2008. Back

he orders dismissing those defendants should be vacated so that the district court can apply current law to defendants’ motions. Standard of Review The Second Circuit “review[s] de novo a district court’s dismissal of a complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), construing the complaint liberally, accepting all factual a

83075 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2009) ocesecseesseeseeeseeneen United States v. Smith, 18 U.S. 153 (1820) cececssssecssessessesseeeneens United States v. Yousef, 327 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2003)... eee United States v. Yunis, 924 F.2d 1086 (D.C. Cir. 1991)... Uthman v. Obama, 637 F.3d 400 (D.C. Cir. 2011) wc Weiss

favor.” Amaker v. N.Y. State Dep’t of *63 Corr. Servs., 435 F. App’x 52, 54 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc., 282 F.3d 147, 152 (2d Cir. 2002)). WESTLAW HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384 --- PAGE BREAK --- In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) Argument I. Th

99) 24 United States v. Washington, 705 F.2d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1983) 14, 15 United States v. White, 972 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992) 33 United States v. Yousef, 327 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2003) 19 iv EFTA00027311 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 35 Filed 04/24/20 Page 6 of 34 PRELIMINARY ST

on. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); see also United States v. Coppa, 267 F.3d 132, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2001). Evidence is "material" in this sense only if "its suppression undermines confidence in the outcome of a trial." United States v. Bagley, 473

material." United States v. Persico, 645 F.3d 85, 111 (2d Cir. 2011) (citing cases). With regard to the timing of disclosing material under Giglio, the Second Circuit, in Coppa, rejected the argument that such material should be disclosed when defendants make a 7 EFTA00027318 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cr-0

99) 24 United States v. Washington, 705 F.2d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1983) 14, 15 United States v. White, 972 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992) 33 United States v. Yousef, 327 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2003) 19 iv EFTA00031267 --- PAGE BREAK --- PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The Government respectfully submits this memorandum of

on. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); see also United States v. Coppa, 267 F.3d 132, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2001). Evidence is "material" in this sense only if "its suppression undermines confidence in the outcome of a trial." United States v. Bagley, 473

material." United States v. Persico, 645 F.3d 85, 111 (2d Cir. 2011) (citing cases). With regard to the timing of disclosing material under Giglio, the Second Circuit, in Coppa, rejected the argument that such material should be disclosed when defendants make a 7 EFTA00031274 --- PAGE BREAK --- demand for it.