Epstein Secrets

Criminal Chief Matt Menchel contacted SLC Schultz about moving me to Appeals after I pointed out actions that I considered to be in violation of the Ashcroft memo and victims' rights legislation. I also understand that SLC Schultz may have knowledge of USA Acosta providing my prosecution memorandum to Cr

7 Tenn Sheet for Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement 5 Undated File folder entitled 'Meeting Timeline' with contents 6 7/24/2006 Letter from Chief Reiter to victims informing them of FBI investigation 7 7/26/2006 South Florida Sun-Sentinel Article Regarding Chief Reiter's referral of case to FBI 8

NS 6(e) MATERIAL EFTA00225427 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 5/1/2006 State Attorney • ga y E B ' Krischer Michael S. Reiter, Chief of Police for Town of Palm Beach Letter urging State Attorney to proceed with probable cause affidavits and cast filing packages or to re

Timeline' with contents 6 7/24/2006 Letter from Chief Reiter to victims informing them of FBI investigation 7

I told them that, if the evidence was there, it was a case that could be prosecuted federally. Det. Recarey then told me that his boss - PBPD Chief Michael Reiter — was still pressing the State Attorney's Office to arrest Epstein. d p ' of probable cause affidavits for the arrests of Jeffrey Epstein, and

u know is completely unacceptable to the FBI, ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement], the victims, and me. These plea negotiations violate the Ashcroft memo, the U.S. Attorney[s’] Manual, and all of the various iterations of the victims’ rights legislation. Strategically, you have started the plea

ice without having made an arrest. Krischer was unfamiliar with Epstein, and the case was assigned to the Crimes Against Children Unit. PBPD Chief Michael Reiter stated in a 2009 civil deposition that when the PBPD initially brought the case to the State Attorney’s Office in 2005, Krischer was supportive of t

position that when the PBPD initially brought the case to the State Attorney’s Office in 2005, Krischer was supportive of the investigation and told Reiter, “Let’s go for it,” because, given the nature of the allegations, Epstein was “somebody we have to stop.” Krischer told OPR, however, that both th

...................................15 D. PBPD Chief Reiter Becomes Concerned with the State Attorney’s Offic

he prosecutor harbors a good faith doubt, based on either the law or the evidence, as to the government’s ability to prove the charge at trial. The Ashcroft Memo explains that the “basic policy” “requires federal prosecutors to charge and pursue all charges that are determined to be readily provable” an

related to the pressure he had been getting from Chief Reiter about the Epstein case. 83 Lefkowitz se

. I have had coffee with no one.” Krischer told OPR that the “reasons” to which he referred related to the pressure he had been getting from Chief Reiter about the Epstein case. 83 Lefkowitz set forth arguments similar to those Sanchez had presented to Lourie, as to why registration “based o

o understand that Criminal Chief contacted SLC about moving me to Appeals after I pointed out actions that I considered to be in violation of the Ashcroft memo and victims' rights legislation. I also understand that SLC ma have knowled e of USA Acosta providing my prosecution memorandum to Main Jus

d, but I told them that, if the evidence was there, it was I case that could be prosecuted federally. Det. then told me that his boss - PBPD Chief Michael — was still pressing the State Attorney's Office to arrest Epstein. Det. had prepared series of probable cause affidavits for the arrests of Jeffre