Epstein Secrets

nt Mr. EFTA00725563 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington IU, a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Plaintiff further alleges that Eps

bility and not contest jurisdiction only when certain expressly delineated conditions precedent were fulfilled by litigating claimants, see, infra, Par 4b. Although the Agreement was silent on the timing of interim payments, and on what procedure would be used to resolve disputes as to whether certain

costa and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Paintiff further alleges that Eps

aive liability and not contest jurisdiction only-when certain well defined conditions precedent were fulfilled by litigating claimants, see, infra, Par 4b. Although the Agreement was EFTA00729061 silent on the timing of interim payments, and on what procedure would be used to resolve disputes as to

costa and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Paintiff further alleges that Eps

aive liability and not contest jurisdiction only-when certain well defined conditions precedent were fulfilled by litigating claimants, see, infra, Par 4b. Although the Agreement was EFTA00729142 silent on the timing of interim payments, and on what procedure would be used to resolve disputes as to

nt Mr. EFTA00614563 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington IU, a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Plaintiff further alleges that Eps

bility and not contest jurisdiction only when certain expressly delineated conditions precedent were fulfilled by litigating claimants, see, infra, Par 4b. Although the Agreement was silent on the timing of interim payments, and on what procedure would be used to resolve disputes as to whether certain