4
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
y of a claim for malicious prosecution in its own District and other Florida state and federal courts. See,
on behalf of his clients. These complaints are all public record and have not been attached, but are available in this Court’s files and the files of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. | 50. In addition to the complaints filed against Epstein in Florida, a female in New York, Ava Cordero, filed
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013338 →Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed
ly limited to restitution, as many other CVRA rights clearly apply before conviction.''* Reviewing these two cases in an extended, published opinion, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas noted that reading these two decisions as standing for the proposition that charges must be filed for CVRA rights
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014058 →ial evidence that an identifiable person has been directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, and in the judgment of the officer or employee, that person is a putative victim of that offense. This formulation borrows from the CVRA’s coverage
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014071 →CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
er prosecutors formally file [*68] criminal charges? Or do they attach at some earlier point in the process? Does v. United States, a federal case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, usefully illustrates the issue. *° In that case, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florid
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017609 →ial evidence that an identifiable person has been directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, and in the judgment of the officer or employee, that person is a putative victim of that offense. This formulation borrows from the CVRA's
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017626 →us defendants filed motions to dismiss. Holdings: The District Court, Casey, J., held that: (1) jurisdictional discov
man, Michael K. Kellogg, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd & Evans PLLC (DC), Law- rence Saul Robbins, Robbins Russell Eng- lert Orseck & Untereiner LLP, Washing- ton, DC, Jean Engelmayer Kalicki, Arnold & Porter, LLP, John Joseph Walsh, Car- ter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, Omar T. Mohammedi, Law Office of Omar T. Mo-
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017844 →Entities connected to both Washington, D.C. and U.S. District Court

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
New York City
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
New York
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON