Epstein Secrets

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy'. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

ach County (Case nos. 2008-cf- 009381AXXXMB and 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB), for conduct involving the same plan and scheme as alleged herein. 32. As to PlaintiffJane Doe, Epstein could have been charged with criminal violations of Florida Statute §796.07(2) (including subsections (I), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) ther

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi 1 Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy i Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

h County (Case nos. 2008-cf- 00938 1 AXXXMB and 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB), for conduct involving the same plan and scheme as alleged herein. 31. As to PlaintiffJane Doe, Epstein could have been charged with criminal violations of - 5 - EFTA00175863 'Case 9:08-cv-( 31-KAM Document 60 Enterer FLSD Docket 02/2

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-Incrimination. See DeLisi I Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41b DCA 1983)• Malloy I Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

ach County (Case nos. 2008-cf- 009381AXXXMB and 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB), for conduct involving the same plan and scheme as alleged herein. 31. As to PlaintiffJane Doe, Epstein could have been charged with criminal violations of - 5 - EFTA00175622 Case 9:08-cv-80 KAM Document 56 Entered I LSD Docket 02, 20