Epstein Secrets

' 09 45:34 R2M-THOtilAS & LOCICE19 8139843070 • 7-988 P003/007 F-845 •• IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIÄI, CIRCUIT 1:. . . AND PDX PALM BEACH COUNTY, FONDA 1' I . . . • CRIMINAL DIVISION ' • I STATg. FLoR04:. :! • • . . • • • I . • • : 3 4. : I . JEFFREY EP8TEN • ; t iI • ?3r

THE COURT: All address -- I assume 4 all of this-to and from work and any other 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 approved activities restricts him to Palm Beach County, is that correct? PROBATION OFFICER: That is correct, . Your Honor. THE COURT: So let's be clear, everything, from the day he walks out occurs i

to produce the documents under seal and the trial court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were produced. 1.4, The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and noted Mariner has failed to explain how the production of the reports under seal would result in any prejudic

urt will hear "Epstein's Motion to Stay Disclosure of Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum Pending Review". DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Bea ounty, Florida this day of June, 2009. Copies furnished: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attonal.fice - Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, West

A00231314 RECYCLED PAPER TO REORDER CALL 954416.9399 I--` Co EFTA00231315 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2008CF009381A DIVISION W STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. MOTION TO MAKE COURT RECORDS CONFIDENTIAL Comes

to produce the documents under seal and the trial court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were produced. 14„, The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and noted Mariner has failed to explain how the production of the reports under seal would result in any prejudic

870 EFTA02729854 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00332195 EFTA_00204871 EFTA02729855 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2008CF009381A DIVISION W STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. MOTION TO MAKE COURT RECORDS CONFIDENTIAL Comes

ed to produce the documents under seal and the trial court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were produced. a The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and noted Mariner has failed to explain bow the production of the reports under seal would result in any prejudic

e) Spencer t. Kuvin, Esquire (via facsimile) EFTA00231116 day of June, 2009. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION "W" CASE NO. 502008CF009381AXXMB 502006CF009454AXXMB STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant ORDER DENYIN

d to produce the documents under seal and the trial court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were produced. Id. The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and noted Mariner has failed to explain how the production of the reports under seal would result in any prejudic

e) Spencer t. Kuvin, Esquire (via facsimile) EFTA00232236 day of June, 2009. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION "W" CASE NO. 502008CF009381A>O(MB 502006CF009454AXXMB STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant ORDER DENYI

d to produce the documents under seal and the trial court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were produced. Id. The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and noted Mariner has failed to explain how the production of the reports under seal would result in any prejudic

200 Palm ns, FL (561) (561) By: Pige of 4 4 EFTA00232434 EFTA00232435 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2008CF009381A DIVISION W STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. MOTION TO MAKE COURT RECORDS CONFIDENTIAL Comes

d to produce the documents under seal and the trial court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were produced. Id, The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and noted Mariner has failed to explain how the production of the reports under seal would result in any prejudic