Epstein Secrets

Transcript - Palm 962.00 Beach Rep 03/12/18 Filing Fee 1, It', ict Court of Appeal 300.00 03/12/18 Witness Fe -15.00 03/12/18 Miscellanea ')alm Beach County Law -100.00 Library 03/14/18 Misceilanec (;) - Best Evidence, Inc. 547.19 03/15/18 Miscel lane dm Beach County Sheriffs -61.57 Office 03/23/18

include trial court's multip' .rences to J. Epstein's original proceeding as bei :nesis" for B. Edwards' counterclaim 03/10/18 RJG Revir. s of Judicial Administration re sealing of rector( Jpellate court 03/10/18 RJG Reviev. yze correspondence from non-party intervel. ounsel re failure to caption them In fil

squire (via facsimile) Spencer t. Kuvin, Esquire (via facsimile) EFTA00180624 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION "W" CASE NO. 502008CF009381AXXMB 502006CF0094S4AXXMB STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant ORDER DENYIN

ncluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (Id.)

e) Spencer t. Kuvin, Esquire (via facsimile) EFTA00231116 day of June, 2009. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION "W" CASE NO. 502008CF009381AXXMB 502006CF009454AXXMB STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant ORDER DENYIN

ncluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (Id.)

e) Spencer t. Kuvin, Esquire (via facsimile) EFTA00232236 day of June, 2009. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION "W" CASE NO. 502008CF009381A>O(MB 502006CF009454AXXMB STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant ORDER DENYI

ncluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (Id.)