Epstein Secrets

were commenced in Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida, or the Florida Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County. These cases related to matters alleged to have occurred over 8 years ago exclusively within Palm Beach County and had no relation to the business o

one, which was claimed to have arisen out of matters alleged to have occurred over 13 years ago in New York and has been settled, were commenced in Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida, or the Florida Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County. These cases related t

12, 2007, counsel for the SDFL (AUSAs Lourie, Garcia, and Villafana) and counsel for Epstein (Messrs. Lefcourt, Lefkowitz, and Goldberger) met with Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krisher and Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek to discuss a plea to an 08-80736-9,-MARRA P-014945 EFTA00224732 Informatio

presentative to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto. The parties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge Edward B. Davis should be that independent third-party. Ultimately, Judge Davis selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Or

12, 2007, counsel for the SDFL (AUSAs Lourie, Garcia, and Villafana) and counsel for Epstein (Messrs. Lefcourt, Lefkowitz, and Goldberger) met with Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krisher and Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek to discuss a plea to an 4 EFTA00190441 Information in the state court that

presentative to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto. The parties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge Edward B. should be that independent third-party. Ultimately, Judge selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Orseck, Jose

12, 2007, counsel for the SDFL (AUSAs Lourie, Garcia, and Villafafia) and counsel for Epstein (Messrs. Lefcourt, Lefkowitz, and Goldberger) met with Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krisher and Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek to discuss a plea to an Information in the state court that would satisfy the

ve to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto as Tab E. The parties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge Edward B. should be that independent third-party/special master. Ultimately, Judge selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurs

e marketing effort of the Ponzi scheme. EFTA00596503 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were a

raudulent court 10 EFTA00596534 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

e marketing effort of the Ponzi scheme. EFTA00729418 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were a

fraudulent court 10 EFTA00729449 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

e marketing effort of the Ponzi scheme. EFTA00795602 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were a

lent court 10 EFTA00795633 ' • 4 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately S23 million. The fraudulent co

Team's clients, E.W., L.M. or Jane Doe. EFTA00193786 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were a

raudulent court 10 EFTA00193860 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

12, 2007, counsel for the SDFL (AUSAs Lourie, Garcia, and Villafafta) and counsel for Epstein (Messrs. Lefcourt, Lefkowitz, and Goldberger) met with Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krisher and Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek to discuss a plea to an Information in the state court that would satisfy the

sentative to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto as Tab arties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge E B. should be that independent third-party/special master. Ultimately, Judge selecte o ert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Or

the marketing effort of the Ponzi scheme. EFTA00223282 Epstein 1RRA, et al. Page S6 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Borger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were a

raudulent court 10 EFTA00223313 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co