Epstein Secrets

Case 9:08-cv-b., r . .KAMon, 7rEnteiresd ts--dOciDocRet i/2008 Page 371 of 40 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND POR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 50200SCA005240XXXXMD vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, andlia Defendants. AFFIDAVIT OE IMPitory,R SERV, a COMES NOW ERIC LAMAZAILES, who

t,,,d11-KADA u DeeUi. ageiorst Entlateti,...Mtgl990ecRet i/2008 Page 19 of 40 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TRE FIFTEENTH JUDICIALCIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM l3EiACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO,: IS or SO SIM Plaintiff, VS, JEFFREY EPSTEJN, and Defendants. 4)2006 GA 00524 0 XXIX MBR'A SIJM M/Qh_s 'ID DEFENDANT: ,I

#12 in the case of JANE DOE, a/k/a. JANE DOE NO. 1 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al. Case NO.08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON should it be Returned to EPSTEIN by the State Court, and expedite the duplication of this evidence immediately upon its return, in advance of any Rule 26 conference. EFTA00175478 Case 9:08-cv-86, .

leged Documents and Testimony from Qtask, Inc. [D.E. 355]. 3 Epstein v. Rothstein, et aL, Case #09-CA-040800-MBAG, 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. 4 Dep. Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein v. Rothstein, et al., March 17, 2010, p. 6 —128. 2 EFTA00780308 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 818 Filed 07/19/

materials which the Circuit Court would not allow. See Epstein's Motion to Compel, DE 807. III. Memorandum of Law A. Discovery Issues Related to the State Court Issued Subpoena Arc Not Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court Despite Epstein's stated position to the contrary, neither 28 U.S.C. §§ 152 or 1334 co

ntly incarcerated in the Palm Bench County Stockade, 6. The attorney for the plaintiff desires persons( service on Jeffrey Epstein while he is in the Palm Beach County Stockade. This fax was retetved by GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http.fiwww.gli.corn 37 01 40 EFTA00234104 Case 9:08-cv-8

Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 5 of 40 5. The State Court docket has been filed. All papers filed in the State Court are attached to this Removal Petition. Conclusion Because this is a civil action between citizens of different states, excluding any fraudulently