Epstein Secrets

provide information about his knowledge of relevant information. 2011 In 2011, in the state case of Epstein 1 Edwards (No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct.)), counsel for Edwards (Jack Scarola, Esq.) contacted Dershowitz to seek his cooperation in answering questions about his knowledge of Eps

ized with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under the age of 18?" Jeffrey Epstein Depo. at 90, Epstein'. Edwards, No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB (Palm. Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. Mar. 17, 2010) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 24). Indeed, going a step further, on October 8, 2009, Epstein took the Fifth when asked whe

a phone) as the vehicle of the inducement. See, e.g., United States ' Murrel, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cir. 2004) (government must ... prove that Murrell, using the intemet, acted with a specific intent to persuade a means to engage in unlawful sex). In fact, we have reviewed every indictment filed i

evidentiary hurdles that have been identified, the existence of a State felony plea and sentence that have been advocated by the State Attorney for Palm Reach County, and the many issues of prosecutorial misconduct and overzealousness that have permeated the investigation. I also request that you provide us with

statute makes clear, the essence of this crime is the communication itself—not the resulting act. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Murrell, underscores the point: The defendant in Bailey contended that attempt under § 2422(6) 'requires the specific intent to commit illegal sexual acts

I T-011 P.004/004 F-076 STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEEN111 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2006CF009454AIOC NOTICE OF HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hu called up for hewing the following: JUDGE: San

e.g. with himself or a third party), without then actually committing any sex act himself, he would nevertheless violate §2422(b)." United States v. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (02' Cu. 2000) ("Congress has made a clear choice to crim

nett T-011 P.004/004 F-076 STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, N AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2006CF009454A3DC NOTICE OF HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hes called up for hewing the following: JUDGE: Sa

(e.g. with himself or a third party), without then actually committing any sex act himself, he would nevertheless violate §2422(b)." United States'. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cir. 2004). See also United States Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (02' Cu. 2000) ("Congress has made a clear choice to crimi

f spaa. • The breakers? PGA7 Trump? 6 A. AbOOlutelY. • 0. The Ritz Carlton? The Pour Seasons? And $ probably a thousand other places la Palo Beach County? 9 ebb. V1LLIIS: Object to the form of the 10 questIon. 11 BY NI. COITTON: 12 Vali, let ye strike that. 11 Ara um: ewers that therm'. norm

•COuniniscant Pp. 116 1 2 O. That never happened? 3 A. Never happened. 4 O. You mentioned that Mr. Epstein put you in 5 contact with Mr. Murrell, 18 that Correct? MR. °UPTON: Fag. 7 THE 14119690: Hot Hr. Crinkle.. • BY MR. METMELSICINt • O. Huh? 10 A. It wasn't Mr. Epstein. 11 O.

• STATE OP FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 7-066 P.004/004 F-076 IN THE cntcurr COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2006CF009454ArX NOTICE or }SAIUNG PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned has called up for hearing the following: JUDGE: Sa

e.g. with himself or a third party), without then actually committing any sex act himself, he would nevertheless violate §2422(b)." United States v. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cu. 2004). See also United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (61° Cir. 2000) ("Congress has made a clear choice to crimi