Epstein Secrets

he validity of an order restricting publicity because its ability to gather news is directly impaired or curtailed.” Lewis, 426 So. 2d at 4; see also Carlson v. United States, 837 F.3d 753, 757-58 (7th Cir. 2016) (“[a]s a member of the public, [the Reporters Committee] has standing to assert [its] claim” t

neyJ3;irry Kdscher's handli"hg - . . . . . I ofl:he c:as_e in a bhmtly critical leuert:o Krischer la.st ye·ar before Epstein was indicted, I Reitet referred the mattef·to the,FBlto determine whether any federal l~ws had been viol;ited. Epstein's allie_s c.91Jntered by attacking the chief person

to the FBI to determine: whether any federal laws had been violated. Epstein’s allies countered by attacking the chief personally and professionally. Reiters department investigated Epstein for 11 months; Police sifted repeatedly through his trash and conducted surveillance on his five-bedroom, 7 1/2-batb,

to take the unprecedented step of presenting the evidence against Epstein to a grand jury, rather than directly charging him. Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiterwas furious, with State Attorney Barry Krischer, saying in a May 2006 letter that the prosecutor should disqualify himself "I continue to find your offic

re it was to begin receiving evidence. (1) Police Chief Reiter’s Letter to the State Attorney. 16. On May 1, 200

000170 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Epstein on the'Ie~s serfous charge,-Pohce Chief Michael Reiter referred the ,case to the FBI to, determine wheth~r there were federal law violations; After a spate of stories· about the case last week, Ne

e validity of an order restricting publicity because its ability to gather news is directly impaired or curtailed.” Lewis, 426 So. 2d at 4; see also Carlson v. United States, 837 F.3d 753, 757–58 (7th Cir. 2016) (“[a]s a member of the public, [the Reporters Committee] has standing to assert [its] claim”

Dershowitz. 12. Another grand jury was convened in April 2006, but canceled the day before it was to begin receiving evidence. (1) Police Chief Reiter’s Letter to the State Attorney. 13. On May 1, 2006, Town of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter wrote a “personal and confidential” letter to t

it was to begin receiving evidence. (1) Police Chief Reiter’s Letter to the State Attorney. 13. On May 1, 2006, Town of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter wrote a “personal and confidential” letter to then Palm Beach County State Attorney, Barry Krischer, stating: I must renew my prior observation t

o charge him with sexual activity with minors. When the grand jury indicted NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Epstein on the less serious charge1 Police Chief Michael Reiter referred the case to the FBI to determine whether there were federal law violations. After a spate of stories about the case last week1 New Y

it was to begin receiving evidence. (1) Police Chief Reiter’s Letter to the State Attorney. 13. On May 1, 2

he validity of an order restricting publicity because its ability to gather news is directly impaired or curtailed.” Lewis, 426 So. 2d at 4; see also Carlson v. United States, 837 F.3d 753, 757-58 (7th Cir. 2016) (“[a]s a member of the public, [the Reporters Committee] has standing to assert [its] claim” t

Alan Dershowitz. 15. Another grand jury was convened in April 2006, but canceled the day before it was to begin receiving evidence. (1) Police Chief Reiter’s Letter to the State Attorney. 16. On May 1, 2006, Town of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter wrote a “personal and confidential” letter to then

efore it was to begin receiving evidence. (1) Police Chief Reiter’s Letter to the State Attorney. 16. On May 1, 2006, Town of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter wrote a “personal and confidential” letter to then Palm Beach County State Attorney, Barry Krischer, stating: I must renew my prior observation to yo

re it was to begin receiving evidence. (1) Police Chief Reiter’s Letter to the State Attorney. 16. On May 1, 200

the validity of an order restricting publicity because its ability to gather news is directly impaired or curtailed.” Lewis, 426 So.2d at 4; see also Carlson v. United States, 837 F.3d 753, 757-58 (7th Cir. 2016) (“[a]s a member of the public, [the Reporters Committee] has standing to assert [its] claim” t

~2(p0v7 ' CA/AroPfi,!il5P~Jl% BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 31/27/2023 4:10:49 PM 11. On May 1, 2006, Town of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter wrote a “personal and confidential” letter to former State Attorney Krischer, stating: I must renew my prior observation to you that I continue to fi

nd consider ifgood and sufficient reason exists to requireyour disqualificationfrom theprosecution ofthese cases. (Emphasis supplied) Appendix at 5 (“Reiter Letter”). 12. Chief Reiter wrote the letter because he “knew that Mr. Krischer was making decisions about this case” and “felt his objectivity was la

f solicitation of prostitution. There is no mention in the indictm~nt of the victim being a minor. See Appendix at 6 (Indictment at p. 42). I 20. Chi_ef Reiter did not "consider fifteen-year-olds, sixte~n--'-y~ar-olds who are paid money to engage in sexual contact [as] prostitution ... "Appendix at 4 (Reite

une 18, 2016). "Good cause" and diligence were not shown when a party raised the prospect of a deposition nine days prior to the discovery deadline. Carlson v. Geneva City School Dist, 277 F.R.D. 90 (W.D.N.Y. 2011); compare Reese v. Intern. Terminals, Inc., 286 F.R.D. 282 (E.D. Va. 2012) (depositions n

esses Emmy Taylor, JoJo Fontanilla. and Michael Reiter. (Doc. #224 at 2 n.4) She does not state her int

nly seeks to take three de ositions beyond the limit of ten and that she no longer seeks depositions of witnesses Emmy Taylor, JoJo Fontanilla. and Michael Reiter. (Doc. #224 at 2 n.4) She does not state her intentions with respect to other witnesses, like Maria Alessi, that she noticed but never deposed. Howe

ned to an institution that was caught unprepared for this virus." Ratcliffe: "No Greater Threat" To US Than China. DNI Ratcliffe said on Fox News' Tucker Carlson Tonight (12/7), "There are a lot of people who for economic reasons do not want China to be our greatest threat. There are a lot of people who for

ic Rep. Nita Lowey and community advocate Harvey Reiter. Other attendees include Dem Rep. Ted Deutch and

ined to an institution that was caught unprepared for this virus." Ratcliffe: "No Greater Threat" To US Than China. DNI Ratcliffe said on Fox News' Tucker Carlson Tonight <https://video.foxnews.corn/v/6214783970001? playlist_id=5198073478001fisp=show-clips> (12/7), "There are a lot of people who for economic r

ic Rep. Nita Lowey and community advocate Harvey Reiter. Other attendees include Dem Rep. Ted Deutch and

itution that was caught unprepared for this virus." Ratcliffe: "No Greater Threat" To US Than China. EFTA00148134 DNI Ratcliffe said on Fox News' Tucker Carlson Tonight (12/7), "There are a lot of people who for economic reasons do not want China to be our greatest threat. There are a lot of people who for

tic Rep. Nita Lowey and community advocate Harvey Reiter. Other attendees include Dem Rep. Ted Deutch and