Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
8 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubert need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubert need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubert need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubert need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (53)
Entities connected to both Ulbricht and E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON28 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
United States
LOCATION23 w/ Ulbricht·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON20 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION15 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION16 w/ Ulbricht·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Ulbricht·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON7 w/ Ulbricht·6 w/ E.E.O.C.
DA
Daubert
PERSON6 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Ulbricht·2 w/ E.E.O.C.
Paul Ryan
PERSON8 w/ Ulbricht·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
LR
Lisa Rocchio
PERSON5 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Russell Simmons
PERSON5 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Ulbricht·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON8 w/ Ulbricht·3 w/ E.E.O.C.
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ E.E.O.C.
Valle
PERSON6 w/ Ulbricht·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
DI
Dietz
PERSON6 w/ Ulbricht·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
Ryan Hall
PERSON6 w/ Ulbricht·4 w/ E.E.O.C.
Alto v. Sun Pharm
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Ulbricht·6 w/ E.E.O.C.