Epstein Secrets

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

s. Mr. Epstein's current notoriety minimizes any conceivable risk of flight even further. The location where he could be detained — his residence on East 71' Street in New York has entrances (one on the street, one in the back) that can be easily monitored by video. With all of his financial resources in

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

s. Mr. Epstein's current notoriety minimizes any conceivable risk of flight even further. The location where he could be detained — his residence on East 71' Street in New York has entrances (one on the street, one in the back) that can be easily monitored by video. With all of his financial resources in

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

s. Mr. Epstein's current notoriety minimizes any conceivable risk of flight even further. The location where he could be detained — his residence on East 71' Street in New York has entrances (one on the street, one in the back) that can be easily monitored by video. With all of his financial resources in

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

s. Mr. Epstein's current notoriety minimizes any conceivable risk of flight even further. The location where he could be detained — his residence on East 71' Street in New York has entrances (one on the street, one in the back) that can be easily monitored by video. With all of his financial resources in