Epstein Secrets

evel of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. C 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspeprft=1-ITMLE8tifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00180828 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389, 24 F

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

evel of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLEecifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00231328 Page 3 of 11 7691.2d 389 769 .2d

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

e level of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. 2009 Thomson Reuters/West No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.eom/print/printstream.aspx?prfl=HTMLE&ifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00232448 Page 3 of 11 769 So.2d 389 769 So.

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian. Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did