Epstein Secrets

evel of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. C 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspeprft=1-ITMLE8tifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00180828 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389, 24 F

n's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it. P mg on the production of the NM agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NM was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has

evel of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLEecifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00231328 Page 3 of 11 7691.2d 389 769 .2d

in's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NPA was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has

e level of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. 2009 Thomson Reuters/West No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.eom/print/printstream.aspx?prfl=HTMLE&ifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00232448 Page 3 of 11 769 So.2d 389 769 So.

in's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the Fourth DCA. Since this NPA was never properly sealed in the first place, a Stay is improper because this document is a public record until such time as it has