Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). Thus, if an item is not discoverable under Rule 16, a party cannot make it discoverable simply by subpoenaing it under Rule 17. United States v. Barnes, No. S9 04-CR-186 (SCR), 2008 WL 9359654, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2008). To determine whether issuance of the subpoena is appropriate, the Court co
dum, or other written communication of information of any kind." The use of the terms "all" and "any" "do not evince specificity." United States v. Tagliaferro, No. 19-CR-472 (PAC), 2021 WL 980004, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2021). Here, the requests do not identify specific lawyers or employees of BSF whose
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). Thus, if an item is not discoverable under Rule 16, a party cannot make it discoverable simply by subpoenaing it under Rule 17. United States v. Barnes, No. S9 04-CR-186 (SCR), 2008 WL 9359654, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2008). To determine whether issuance of the subpoena is appropriate, the Court co
dum, or other written communication of information of any kind." The use of the terms "all" and "any" "do not evince specificity." United States v. Tagliaferro, No. 19-CR-472 (PAC), 2021 WL 980004, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2021). Here, the requests do not identify specific lawyers or employees of BSF whose
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). Thus, if an item is not discoverable under Rule 16, a party cannot make it discoverable simply by subpoenaing it under Rule 17. United States v. Barnes, No. S9 04-CR-186 (SCR), 2008 WL 9359654, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2008). To determine whether issuance of the subpoena is appropriate, the Court co
dum, or other written communication of information of any kind." The use of the terms "all" and "any" "do not evince specificity." United States v. Tagliaferro, No. 19-CR-472 (PAC), 2021 WL 980004, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2021). Here, the requests do not identify specific lawyers or employees of BSF whose
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00020299
). Thus, if an item is not discoverable under Rule 16, a party cannot make it discoverable simply by subpoenaing it under Rule 17. United States v. Barnes, No. S9 04-CR-186 (SCR), 2008 WL 9359654, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2008). To determine whether issuance of the subpoena is appropriate, the Court co
Page: EFTA00020299 →Page EFTA00020300
dum, or other written communication of information of any kind." The use of the terms "all" and "any" "do not evince specificity." United States v. Tagliaferro, No. 19-CR-472 (PAC), 2021 WL 980004, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2021). Here, the requests do not identify specific lawyers or employees of BSF whose
Page: EFTA00020300 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (29)
Entities connected to both Barneys New York and Tagliaferro
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON239 w/ Barneys·4 w/ Tagliaferro
United States
LOCATION114 w/ Barneys·4 w/ Tagliaferro
Prince Andrew
PERSON111 w/ Barneys·2 w/ Tagliaferro
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON96 w/ Barneys·6 w/ Tagliaferro
Chris Tucker
PERSON70 w/ Barneys·2 w/ Tagliaferro
Marc Rich
PERSON48 w/ Barneys·6 w/ Tagliaferro
Lawrence Krauss
PERSON41 w/ Barneys·2 w/ Tagliaferro
Cynthia Nixon
PERSON37 w/ Barneys·6 w/ Tagliaferro
Audrey Strauss
PERSON25 w/ Barneys·2 w/ Tagliaferro
David Boies
PERSON20 w/ Barneys·6 w/ Tagliaferro
Giglio
PERSON17 w/ Barneys·6 w/ Tagliaferro
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON19 w/ Barneys·4 w/ Tagliaferro
SK
Skelos
PERSON16 w/ Barneys·6 w/ Tagliaferro
Brady
PERSON16 w/ Barneys·4 w/ Tagliaferro
NS
NORMAN SEABROOK
PERSON15 w/ Barneys·4 w/ Tagliaferro
Michael Avenatti
PERSON13 w/ Barneys·4 w/ Tagliaferro
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Barneys·2 w/ Tagliaferro
BE
Bergstein
PERSON6 w/ Barneys·6 w/ Tagliaferro
Alison J. Nathan
PERSON8 w/ Barneys·3 w/ Tagliaferro
Aguilar
PERSON6 w/ Barneys·4 w/ Tagliaferro