Epstein Secrets

tead Must be Challenged (If Necessary) at the Conclusion of a Case. 11 B. The District Court's Discovery Order is Not Immediately Appealable Under Perlman. 14 II. EPSTEIN HAS NOT PROVEN ANY INJURY WHICH WOULD WARRANT THIS COURT'S EXERCISE OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION 18 CONCLUSION 20 EFTA00209358

y involved in plea negotiations with the U.S. Attorney's Office which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." CVRA Petition, DE 1 at 3. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe No. 1 asserted a violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federa

tead Must be Challenged (If Necessary) at the Conclusion of a Case. 11 B. The District Court's Discovery Order is Not Immediately Appealable Under Perlman. 14 II. EPSTEIN HAS NOT PROVEN ANY INJURY WHICH WOULD WARRANT THIS COURT'S EXERCISE OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION 18 CONCLUSION 20 EFTA00209570

y involved in plea negotiations with the U.S. Attorney's Office which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." CVRA Petition, DE 1 at 3. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe No. 1 asserted a violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federa

f these issues for the functioning of the criminal justice system counsels in favor of granting the requested stay. Intervenors have standing under Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7 (1918), to pursue an interlocutory appeal of the Court's order, and questions of privilege and confidentiality asserte

was currently involved in plea negotiations with the USAO/SDFL, which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." [CVRA Petition, DE 1, 13]. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe 1 asserted the violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federal