5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
the problem with the alternative that you propose is that the jurisdictional issue and the merits issues overlap. You argue as to jurisdiction that Perlman does not apply because there is no privilege. And our argument on the merits is that there is a privilege. So privilege is at the heart of the juris
s message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. EFTA00208565 From: Jackie Peraek [ Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 11:08 PM To: Paul Cassell Cc: I.
the problem with the alternative that you propose is that the jurisdictional issue and the merits issues overlap. You argue as to jurisdiction that Perlman does not apply because there is no privilege. And our argument on the merits is that there is a privilege. So privilege is at the heart of the juris
s message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Jackie Perczek [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 11:08 PM To: Paul Cassell
the problem with the alternative that you propose is that the jurisdictional issue and the merits issues overlap. You argue as to jurisdiction that Perlman does not apply because there is no privilege. And our argument on the merits is that there is a privilege. So privilege is at the heart of the juris
s message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Jackie Perczek [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 11:08 PM To: Paul Cassell
ay. What is your position on this motion? We understand you are conferring with Washington DO), and hope that they will agree that expansion of the Perlman doctrine is clearly not in the Government's interest. Thanks for providing us whatever information you can as soon as you can. Brad Edwards and Pau
is message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [[email protected]] EFTA00209383 rad Edwards (
ircuit decision that an attorney-client rivilege order is not immediately appealable). As you probably know, Epstein plans to rely in United States' Perlman as the basis for an interlocutory appeal. Our understanding is that the Justice Department has long sought to give a narrow construction to Perlman.
s message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Paul Cassell Sent: Thursda , June 27, 2013 7:16 AM To: , USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: , (USAFLS
Entities connected to both Perlman and the Utah State Bar

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Ronald N. Boyce
PERSON
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION
Salt Lake City
LOCATIONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATIONSouthern District
LOCATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Dexter Lee
PERSON
Jackie Perczek
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON