Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D. Fla. 2019) 14 Doe No. I. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 76 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (RJS), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 234 Falter v. Un
rt to apply a bizarre and unprecedented choice-of- federal-law doctrine, under which the defendant asks the Court to apply non-existent rulings from the Eleventh Circuit on an issue that Court does not appear to have reached. (Def. Mot. 1 at 23- 25). This argument has no legal foundation, and the defendant offers no a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D. Fla. 2019) 14 Doe No. 1. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 76 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (US), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 234 Falter v. Uni
rt to apply a bizarre and unprecedented choice-of- federal-law doctrine, under which the defendant asks the Court to apply non-existent rulings from the Eleventh Circuit on an issue that Court does not appear to have reached. (Def. Mot. 1 at 23- 25). This argument has no legal foundation, and the defendant offers no a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D. Fla. 2019) 14 Doe No. 1. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 76 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (US), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 234 Falter v. Uni
rt to apply a bizarre and unprecedented choice-of- federal-law doctrine, under which the defendant asks the Court to apply non-existent rulings from the Eleventh Circuit on an issue that Court does not appear to have reached. (Def. Mot. 1 at 23- 25). This argument has no legal foundation, and the defendant offers no a
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D. Fla. 2019) 14 Doe No. 1. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 76 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (US), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 234 Falter v. Uni
rt to apply a bizarre and unprecedented choice-of- federal-law doctrine, under which the defendant asks the Court to apply non-existent rulings from the Eleventh Circuit on an issue that Court does not appear to have reached. (Def. Mot. 1 at 23- 25). This argument has no legal foundation, and the defendant offers no a
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (444)
Entities connected to both Duren and the Eleventh Circuit
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON22 w/ Duren·210 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON3 w/ Duren·178 w/ the
United States
LOCATION12 w/ Duren·124 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ Duren·110 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON4 w/ Duren·104 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION4 w/ Duren·88 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON10 w/ Duren·78 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Duren·69 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON7 w/ Duren·59 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON5 w/ Duren·60 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON6 w/ Duren·57 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Duren·54 w/ the
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON2 w/ Duren·53 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON4 w/ Duren·50 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Duren·46 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON5 w/ Duren·41 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Duren·34 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON4 w/ Duren·39 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON9 w/ Duren·30 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON14 w/ Duren·23 w/ the