Epstein Secrets

mpletely normal.' But there was little sign of that Monday." -- "A young Indian couple married for love. Then the bride's father hired assassins," Slater reports: "Pranay Perumalla strode into the wedding hall in a midnight blue suit, his face lit by a grin as he clasped the hand of his bride, Amrut

Thomas. One of the two Brooklyn lawyers listed as witnessing its signing is Mariel A. Colon Miro — an attorney for drug kingpin Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman. Miro was once accused of flouting court rules by passing a phone to Chapo's wife so the spouse could communicate with her imprisoned husband. Miro

mpletely normal.' But there was little sign of that Monday." -- "A young Indian couple married for love. Then the bride's father hired assassins," Slater reports: "Pranay Perumalla strode into the wedding hall in a midnight blue suit, his face lit by a grin as he clasped the hand of his bride, Amruth

Thomas. One of the two Brooklyn lawyers listed as witnessing its signing is Mariel A. Colon Miro — an attorney for drug kingpin Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman. Miro was once accused of flouting court rules by passing a phone to Chapo's wife so the spouse could communicate with her imprisoned husband. Miro

urse, whether he would be successful in doing so is dubious. Florida state courts take a dim view of belated challenges to guilty pleas. See, e.g., Guzman-Aviles v. State, 226 So. 3d 339, 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ("Every inroad on the concept of finality undermines confidence in the integrity of our pr

istent position under oath in a separate proceeding, and (2) these inconsistent positions were calculated to make a mockery of the judicial system." Slater v. United States Steel Corp. 871 F.3d 1174, 1181 (11th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation omitted). It should be remembered that Jane Doe 1 and 2 were

urse, whether he would be successful in doing so is dubious. Florida state courts take a dim view of belated challenges to guilty pleas. See, e.g., Guzman-Aviles v. State, 226 So. 3d 339, 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ("Every inroad on the concept of finality undermines confidence in the integrity of our pr

istent position under oath in a separate proceeding, and (2) these inconsistent positions were calculated to make a mockery of the judicial system." Slater v. United States Steel Corp. 871 F.3d 1174, 1181 (11th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation omitted). It should be remembered that Jane Doe 1 and 2 were