Epstein Secrets

stein previously showed why this is incorrect. See Epstein's Motion, D.E. 6440 at n.4. See also Fed. R. Bankr. Proc. 7035; see also generally In re Dillon, 194 B.R. 533 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1996). In fact, the Intervenors make no actual or genuine effort to suggest that their mental states are not in con

MOTION TO TAKE THE INTERVENORS' DEPOSITIONS AND TO COMPEL THEIR MENTAL EXAMINATIONS Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") replies to the Intervenors, IM and Jane Doe's Response (D.E. 6446) to Epstein's Motion to Take the Intervenors' Depositions and to Compel their Mental Examinations (Epstein's "Motion") (D.E. 64

te of limitations has expired for the woman's case criminally and civilly, and will almost certainly be Character: or 3IE-MM-108062 Submitting Dillon: Indexing dismissed. He refused to comment on Epstein's Floridaha es Meanwhile. also acknowledg tat is client was living with him and was at

led federal lawsuit last week, on behalf of the Jane Doe • 101 who allegedly visited Epstein a few times

tifying the person intended to be bound, and not effective as against another who might succeed to the office upon his death or resignation. See Dillon on Municipal Corporations, vol. 4 (5th Ed.) Sec. 1536. The injunction restrains McElligott, his agents, servants, subordinates, and employes, `

s. To inform Jane Doe of dates that he had arranged, Evans called Jane Doe on a cellular telephone that she had acquired from him. Evans also gave Jane Doe's cellular telephone number to customers and told Jane Doe to arrange dates when customers called. During the dates, Ev- ans called Jane Doe on the