Epstein Secrets

er §2422(b), most of which involve the prototypical fact pattern. See, e.g., United States Morton, 364 F.3d 1300 (11ih 2004), judgment vacated for Booker consideration, 12, S. Ct. 1338 (2006); United States' Orrega, 363 F.3ds1093 (11th Cir. 2004); United States Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2003)

provide information about his knowledge of relevant information. 2011 In 2011, in the state case of Epstein 1 Edwards (No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct.)), counsel for Edwards (Jack Scarola, Esq.) contacted Dershowitz to seek his cooperation in answering questions about his knowledge of Eps

ized with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of females under the age of 18?" Jeffrey Epstein Depo. at 90, Epstein'. Edwards, No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB (Palm. Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. Mar. 17, 2010) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 24). Indeed, going a step further, on October 8, 2009, Epstein took the Fifth when asked whe

lve this prototypical fact pattern. See, e.g., United States v. Mono, 364 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2004), vacated for further consideration in light of Booker, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006), opinion reinstated by, 144 Fed. Appx. 804 (2005); United States v. Omega, 363 F.3d 1093 (1Is Cir. 2004); United States v.

I T-011 P.004/004 F-076 STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEEN111 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2006CF009454AIOC NOTICE OF HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hu called up for hewing the following: JUDGE: San

olve this prototypical fact pattern. See, e.g.. United States,. Mono, 364 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2004), vacated for further consideration in light of Booker, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006), oninforueinSigMl_h% 144 Fed. Appx. 804 (2005); United States Gana, 363 F.3d 1093 (11th Cir. 2004); United States'. Miranda

nett T-011 P.004/004 F-076 STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, N AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2006CF009454A3DC NOTICE OF HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hes called up for hewing the following: JUDGE: Sa

a prosecutor 195 The Ashcroft Memo was issued before the Supreme Court decided United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), which struck down the provision of the federal sentencing statute that required federal district judges to impose a sentence

ons related to Epstein. Also on November 26, 2008, Black responded to Villafaña’s letter, acknowledging that Epstein was serving his sentence in the Palm Beach County Work Release Program, but denying that Epstein was in breach of the NPA.184 Black noted that the NPA did not prohibit work release; the NPA expres