Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
irmatively establish that a more expansive interpretation was contemplated." United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (citing Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672), aff'd, 867 F.2d 1425 (2d Cir. 1988)(tbl.). To meet this burden, a defendant must establish that either the text of the agreement
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
irmatively establish that a more expansive interpretation was contemplated." United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (citing Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672), aff'd, 867 F.2d 1425 (2d Cir. 1988)(tbl.). To meet this burden, a defendant must establish that either the text of the agreement
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
irmatively establish that a more expansive interpretation was contemplated." United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (citing Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672), aff'd, 867 F.2d 1425 (2d Cir. 1988)(tbl.). To meet this burden, a defendant must establish that either the text of the agreement
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sion of the statute. (Def. Mot. 2 at 6-7). The defendant's argument on this point is both misleading and unpersuasive. The defendant quotes Senator Patrick Leahy's comments on the 2003 conference committee report to the effect that "the conference agreed to drop language from the original House-passed bill th
irmatively establish that a more expansive interpretation was contemplated." United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (citing Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672), aff'd, 867 F.2d 1425 (2d Cir. 1988)(tbl.). To meet this burden, a defendant must establish that either the text of the agreement
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (428)
Entities connected to both Patrick Leahy and Annabi
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON30 w/ Patrick·59 w/ Annabi
United States
LOCATION21 w/ Patrick·55 w/ Annabi
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON14 w/ Patrick·43 w/ Annabi
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Patrick·32 w/ Annabi
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON19 w/ Patrick·37 w/ Annabi
Prince Andrew
PERSON23 w/ Patrick·32 w/ Annabi
Reid Weingarten
PERSON9 w/ Patrick·46 w/ Annabi
the Southern District
LOCATION10 w/ Patrick·42 w/ Annabi
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Patrick·45 w/ Annabi
Michael Jackson
PERSON18 w/ Patrick·32 w/ Annabi
FBI
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Patrick·36 w/ Annabi
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON15 w/ Patrick·32 w/ Annabi
Julie K. Brown
PERSON20 w/ Patrick·22 w/ Annabi
Anderson
PERSON10 w/ Patrick·32 w/ Annabi
SA
Salameh
PERSON4 w/ Patrick·37 w/ Annabi
LA
Laskow
PERSON4 w/ Patrick·35 w/ Annabi
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON16 w/ Patrick·22 w/ Annabi
George Mitchell
PERSON19 w/ Patrick·18 w/ Annabi
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION17 w/ Patrick·19 w/ Annabi
Harry Reid
PERSON8 w/ Patrick·27 w/ Annabi