Epstein Secrets

orrespondence 6(e) Contains information and documents subject to investigative privilege Box #1 P-002170 Thru P-002246 File folder entitled "Colonial Bank" containing subpoenas, correspondence related to subpoenas, records received in response to subpoenas 6(e) Contains information and documents su

investigation, and Ms. likely testimony. Exhibit 1 at P-003732 thru P-003733. 7. On February 5, 2007, I provided Mr. Eisenberg with two proposed Kastigar letters that, again, discuss the grand jury's investigation. Exhibit 1 at P-003739 thru P-003743, P-003745. 8. In response to a complaint from Mr.

timony solely as a victim/winless. During our last conversation regarding Ms. , you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with the grand jury and intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her

orrespondence 6(e) Contains information and documents subject to investigative privilege Box #1 P-002170 Thru P-002246 File folder entitled "Colonial Bank" containing subpoenas, correspondence related to subpoenas, records received in response to subpoenas 6(e) Contains information and documents su

imony solely as, a victim/witness. During our last conversation regarding Ms. , you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with.the grand jury and intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her

he FBI for investigation 6 7/26/2006 South Florida Sun-Sentinel Article Regarding Chief Reiter's referral of case to FBI _ 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Colonial Bank (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Washington Mutual (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Capital One (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/20

in employees — Janusz Banasiak Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, r. anasi was satisfied with a standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to thi