Epstein Secrets

e there was no time in the schedule to depose Mr. Rothstein. The deposition of Scott Rothstein was taken in the bankruptcy proceeding of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler ("RRA"), but not completed, from December 12, 2011 through December 7 EFTA00808032 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA0

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaint

ements, forged signatures and a fundamental corruption of the many legal protections that the legal system has in place. The law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA") defrauded investors by what Scott Rothstein characterized as legal extortion. He defrauded investors by convincing them into

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The P

egal protections that the legal system has in place. By claiming to be engaged in what is tantamount to legal extortion, the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA") defrauded investors, convincing them into purchasing fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements, incl

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The P