Epstein Secrets

, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction As this court is aware, attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obl

nd 151-154. Accordingly, a more detailed inquiry is required for those same reasons set out above. III. The Legal Standard 9. In sum, nothing in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure forbids a second EFTA00728269 Epstein v. Rothstein. et at Page 6 discovery deposition. Medina v. Yoder Auto Sales. Inc., 743 So.2d 621, 622-623

y, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction As this court is aware, attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obl

and 151-154. Accordingly, a more detailed inquiry is required for those same reasons set out above. III.The Legal Standard 9. In sum, nothing in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure forbids a second EFTA00728262 Epstein v. Rothstein. et at Page 6 discovery deposition. Medina v. Yoder Auto Sales. Inc., 743 So.2d 621, 622-623

5. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to have run a giant Ponzi scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative

issible discovery. The requested materials 15 EFTA00708307 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 04;08:11 Page 16 of 23 are not discoverable under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Bankruptcy Rules of Civil Procedure or any other possibly applicable system of rules. Moreover, the docu

s allegedly taken by Epstein. In fact, this litigation with Epstein catapulted Edwards from an unknown solo practitioner to a partner at Rothstein. Rosenfeldt, Adler. Moreover, Edwards still utilizes his litigious association with Mr. Epstein at his new firm Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, & Lehr

EDWARDS' COUNTERCLAIM Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.110 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files his Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards' ("Edwards") Counterclaim, and states: 1. Epstein

that Scott Rothstein, the partner of plaintiff Brad Edwards, had fled to Morocco to evade criminal prosecution for using their law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), to perpetrate a massive Ponzi scheme. It was widely reported that RRA, Rothstein, Rothstein's partners and other co-conspirators who

NG MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.510 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files this Motion for Summary Judgment on the sole remaining count of Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Fourth Amen

s allegedly taken by Epstein. In fact, this litigation with Epstein catapulted Edwards from an unknown solo practitioner to a partner at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler. Moreover, Edwards still utilizes his litigious association with Mr. Epstein at his new firm Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, & Lehr

EDWARDS' COUNTERCLAIM Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.110 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files his Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards' ("Edwards") Counterclaim, and states: 1. Epstein