Epstein Secrets

hen, has handled a very broad set of problems, virtually of which have been on an emergency basis, including this matter. 3. On November 11, 2009, Rosenfeldt, as the sole officer and director of RRA, executed a resolution appointing Stettin as the CRO of RRA and delegated to Stettin all operational and m

, P.A.'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE [D.E. 405] The Honorable Herbert Stettin ("Stettin"), the State Court appointed1 receiver ("Receiver") and Chief Restructuring Officer ("CRO") of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.'s ("RRA"), hereby responds to the Defe

hen, has handled a very broad set of problems, virtually of which have been on an emergency basis, including this matter. 3. On November 11, 2009, Rosenfeldt, as the sole officer and director of RRA, executed a resolution appointing Stettin as the CRO of RRA and delegated to Stettin all operational and m

, P.A.'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE [D.E. 405) The Honorable Herbert Stettin ("Stettin"), the State Court appointed' receiver ("Receiver") and Chief Restructuring Officer ("CRO") of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.'s ("RRA"), hereby responds to the Defe

hen, has handled a very broad set of problems, virtually of which have been on an emergency basis, including this matter. 3. On November 11, 2009, Rosenfeldt, as the sole officer and director of RRA, executed a resolution appointing Stettin as the CRO of RRA and delegated to Stettin all operational and m

, P.A.'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE [D.E. 405) The Honorable Herbert Stettin ("Stettin"), the State Court appointed' receiver ("Receiver") and Chief Restructuring Officer ("CRO") of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.'s ("RRA"), hereby responds to the Defe

t recall. Q Did you ever learn that privilege was being asserted with respect to the production of any emails that were contained on a Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler server? A Separate from a conversation with my attorneys, I don't recall. Q Are you aware, as you sit here today, that federal bankrupt

ns is of no moment in these proceedings. The alleged privileged e-mails and all issues related to privilege and waiver are currently pending before the State Court. CONCLUSION As the sole basis for seeking to hold Epstein liable for a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order, Movants contend that Epstein's

multiple victims of Jeffrey Epstein's serial molestation of dozens of young children. In 2009, Brad Edwards took a job as an attorney at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA") and continued the prosecution of those civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. When the RRA law firm imploded, Edwards joined in formin

so produced containing 3,804 pages of documents in the first box and 3,880 pages of documents in the second box, totaling 7,684 pages. In May 2012, the State Court Judge Crow ordered 163 pages of documents from the February 23, 2011 privilege log be produced and Edwards and Fanner Jaffe complied. The remaining

5. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to have run a giant Ponzi scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative

relevance, burdensomeness, and attorney-client and other privileges regarding the Razorback Creditors' subpoena. Instead, these issues are left to the State Court judge presiding over their case to decide. I. BACKGROUND The procedural background surrounding the Razorback Creditor's motion is important to t