Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ard looked into all of this, made their recommendation, found him to have 130 points and I see no reason to disturb that." A.96:11-13 (Tr.). While the Court of Appeals has recognized that a Board-generated case summary may constitute "reliable hearsay" upon which the Court may base a SORA risk calculation, the law
EVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ard looked into all of this, made their recommendation, found him to have 130 points and I see no reason to disturb that." A.96:11-13 (Pr.). While the Court of Appeals has recognized that a Board-generated case summary may constitute "reliable hearsay" upon which the Court may base a SORA risk calculation, the law
EVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ard looked into all of this, made their recommendation, found him to have 130 points and I see no reason to disturb that." A.96:11-13 (Tr.). While the Court of Appeals has recognized that a Board-generated case summary may constitute "reliable hearsay" upon which the Court may base a SORA risk calculation, the law
LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ard looked into all of this, made their recommendation, found him to have 130 points and I see no reason to disturb that." A.96:11-13 (Tr.). While the Court of Appeals has recognized that a Board-generated case summary may constitute "reliable hearsay" upon which the Court may base a SORA risk calculation, the law
EVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both the Court of Appeals and The People's Investigation
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON61 w/ the·4 w/ The
George W. Bush
PERSON30 w/ the·4 w/ The
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON22 w/ the·4 w/ The
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON22 w/ the·4 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION16 w/ the·4 w/ The
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON16 w/ the·4 w/ The
Legislature
ORGANIZATION13 w/ the·4 w/ The
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON12 w/ the·4 w/ The
Stephen Hawking
PERSON12 w/ the·2 w/ The
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ the·4 w/ The
Police Department
ORGANIZATION9 w/ the·2 w/ The
New York
LOCATION7 w/ the·4 w/ The
New York City
LOCATION6 w/ the·4 w/ The
Thomas Jefferson
PERSON8 w/ the·2 w/ The
JR
Joe Recarey
PERSON6 w/ the·3 w/ The
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON5 w/ the·4 w/ The
the State of New York
LOCATION5 w/ the·4 w/ The
MA
Matthews
PERSON5 w/ the·4 w/ The
Gilbert
PERSON5 w/ the·4 w/ The
V.I.C.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The