Epstein Secrets

oundation, 82 Goldwater, Barry, 127 Gore, Al, 123 Gorka, Sebastian, 129 Gorsuch, Neil, 85-87, 133 Grimm, Michael, 310 Guardian, 276 Guilfoyle, Kimberly, 223, 272-73, 284 H-1B visas, 36 Haberman, Maggie, 91-92, 206-7, 277 Hagin, Joe, 186, 229 Hahn, Julia, 236 Haig, Alexander, 27 Halberstam, David,

n aggrieved, unyielding, and threatening president dominated the discussion, pushing HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020079 into line his daughter and her husband, Hicks, and Raffel. Kasowitz—the lawyer whose specific job was to keep Trump at arm’s length from Russian-related matters—was kept on hold on the phone for

s the ultimate facilitator of unmediated behavior. His impulses and thoughts—unedited, unreviewed, unchallenged—not only passed through him, but, via Hicks, traveled out into the world without any other White House arbitration. “The problem isn’t Twitter, it’s Hope,” observed one communication staffer.

ound guilty & filed motion for judgment of acquittal and/or new trial, which was denied. 2252(a)(4)(B); 2422(b) No Information E.D. Ky. U.S. v. Kimberly, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27955 (E.D. Ky. 2005) Internet Defendant met 15 yr-old on the Internet; solicited sex from her on the Internet; arranged

29 EFTA00079442 -;"COHRT; C.ASES C6:”14.111•47.Cia.:e. - :finik 4 ;acIale.40,... - ,,, - ' FACILITY FACZS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. v. Hicks. Internet defendant initiated Internet conversation 2422(b); 2423(b) 457 F.3d 838 (8th Cir. 2006), overruled Helder,452 F.3d 751 Stine with "

Xl) & (a)(5XB); 2256; 1512(bX1)& (b)(2XA) No Information 85 EFTA00224219 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE E.D. Ky. U.S. I Kimberly, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27955 (E.D. Ky. 2005) Internet Defendant met 15 yr-old on the Internet; solicited sex from her on the Internet; arranged

20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Information 65 EFTA00224199 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE W.D. Mo. U.S. I Hicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage t in sex ac. 2422(b)

nd guilty & Bled motion for judgment of acquittal and/or new trial, which was denied. 2252(a)(4)(B); 2422(6) No Information • E.D. Ky. U.S. v. Kimberly, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27955 (E.D. Ky. 2005) Internet Defendant met 15 yr-old on the Internet; solicited sex from her on the Internet; arranged

belief that she was 14 yrs-old. 29 EFTA01729513 COURT. . .. . . , • - S ' -- ,S2W114117 - ;FJQCTS'IC0MMUlite4OO,.; •,': -03ARGE U.S. v. Hicks, 457 F.3d 838 (8ih Cir. 2006), overruled Helder, 452 F.3d 751 Internet defendant initiated Internet conversation with "13 yr-old" followed by t