Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mony, finding it to be "quite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131
. No. 397, and Defendant filed a reply, Dkt. No. 398. The Court conducted a Daubert hearing on November 10, 2021, at which both parties examined Dr. Rocchio. Dkt. No. 431. The Court stated its oral opinion at that hearing that it would deny and grant in part Defendant's motion, to be followed by this op
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mony, finding it to be "quite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131
. No. 397, and Defendant filed a reply, Dkt. No. 398. The Court conducted a Daubert hearing on November 10, 2021, at which both parties examined Dr. Rocchio. Dkt. No. 431. The Court stated its oral opinion at that hearing that it would deny and grant in part Defendant's motion, to be followed by this op
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mony, finding it to be "quite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131
. No. 397, and Defendant filed a reply, Dkt. No. 398. The Court conducted a Daubert hearing on November 10, 2021, at which both parties examined Dr. Rocchio. Dkt. No. 431. The Court stated its oral opinion at that hearing that it would deny and grant in part Defendant's motion, to be followed by this op
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00016471
. No. 397, and Defendant filed a reply, Dkt. No. 398. The Court conducted a Daubert hearing on November 10, 2021, at which both parties examined Dr. Rocchio. Dkt. No. 431. The Court stated its oral opinion at that hearing that it would deny and grant in part Defendant's motion, to be followed by this op
Page: EFTA00016471 →Page EFTA00016474
mony, finding it to be "quite common[ ]" and accepted in the academic literature. 385 F. Supp. 3d at 263. Identical testimony was admitted by Judge Furman in United States v. Dupigny, No. 18- Cr.-528 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. 2019), Dkt. No. 198 at 27, by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Randall, 19 Cr. 131
Page: EFTA00016474 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (61)
Entities connected to both Furman and Rocchio
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON24 w/ Furman·19 w/ Rocchio
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON22 w/ Furman·14 w/ Rocchio
Prince Andrew
PERSON8 w/ Furman·17 w/ Rocchio
Julie K. Brown
PERSON9 w/ Furman·13 w/ Rocchio
DA
Daubert
PERSON4 w/ Furman·14 w/ Rocchio
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON10 w/ Furman·7 w/ Rocchio
Southern District
LOCATION3 w/ Furman·14 w/ Rocchio
United States
LOCATION10 w/ Furman·7 w/ Rocchio
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Furman·8 w/ Rocchio
Bill Clinton
PERSON9 w/ Furman·7 w/ Rocchio
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Furman·4 w/ Rocchio
DU
Dupigny
PERSON8 w/ Furman·5 w/ Rocchio
George W. Bush
PERSON10 w/ Furman·2 w/ Rocchio
Colorado
LOCATION7 w/ Furman·5 w/ Rocchio
Baltimore
LOCATION6 w/ Furman·5 w/ Rocchio
Marc Rich
PERSON5 w/ Furman·6 w/ Rocchio
Raymond
PERSON6 w/ Furman·5 w/ Rocchio
LR
Lisa Rocchio
PERSON4 w/ Furman·7 w/ Rocchio
RA
Randall
PERSON4 w/ Furman·6 w/ Rocchio
EN
Engelmayer
PERSON4 w/ Furman·5 w/ Rocchio