6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
.2d 338 (1989) (" Rule 12(b)(6) does not countenance ... dismissals based on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's factual allegations"); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote an
Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-Hurley-Hopkins JANE DOE NO. 7 Plaintiff,
s for which he cannot realistically or genuinely be expected to be charged with a crime are not subject to Fifth Amendment protection. See Krause'. Rhodes, 390 F.Supp 1070, 1071-72 (N.D. Ohio 1974) (allowing questions to be asked regarding personal backgrounds and experiences excluding the event at iss
pondent's assistance both to identify ' See Interrogatory nos. 7, 8, 10, 11, 12. -4- EFTA00221724 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2009 Page 5 of 11 potential sources of information and to produce those sources." Id. at 41. In Bear Stems the Court explained that the fact
.2d 338 (1989) (" Rule 12(b)(6) does not countenance ... dismissals based on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's factual allegations"); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote an
cuments conventionally in any other division of the Southern District of Florida. 1 EFTA00222689 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'162008 Page 2 of 3 a presumption in favor of openness of court records, which "must be balanced against any competing interest advanced." Unite
d.2d 338 (1989) (" Rule 12(b)(6) does not countenance ... dismissals ivsed on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's factual allegations"); Scheueri. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote an
leged conclusory allegations simply attempting to track parts of the statutory language EFTA00175738 Case 9:08-cv-k ,2-KAM Document 41 Entere' FLSD Docket 10/C )8 Page 8 of 10 Case No. CV-80232-Marra-Johnson Page No. 8 in the statute without underlying factual allegations pertaining to the Plaintif
.2d 338 (1989) (" Rule 12(b)(6) does not countenance ... dismissals based on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's factual allegations"); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236. 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a well-pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote an
m the defendant engaged in the commercial sex act had attained the age of 18 years. EFTA00175352 Ci.se 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80811-MARRAIJOHNSON Plaintiff, v. EPSTEIN an
.2d 338 (1989) ( Rule 12(b)(6) does not I countenance ... dismissals b sed on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's factual allegations"); Scheuer . Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a we -pleaded complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote and
lorida Jack Alan Goldber cr Esq. Robert D. Critton. Esq. Is/ Adam D. Horowitz - 8 - EFTA00175625 Case 9:08-cv 119-KAM Document 69 Enter in FLSD Docket D2/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 I JEFFREY EP
Entities connected to both Rhodes and FLSD Docket

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
United States District Court
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONRobert D. Critton
PERSONChambers
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON