Epstein Secrets

at answer. A Okay. Q Let's talk about Jane Doe 102, Jane Doe 7 102, , who was represented by 8 s firm, had nothing to do with 9 Rothstein, Rosenfeld, Adler. Do you know 10 A Who? 11 12 A Can you spell it? 13 Q Common spelling, like the 14 State -- 15 A Can you spell it for me, pleas

t I must assert those rights or risk 3 losing my attorneys. 4 5 6 Q Sure, let's test that answer. A Okay. Q Let's talk about Jane Doe 102, Jane Doe 7 102, , who was represented by 8 s firm, had nothing to do with 9 Rothstein, Rosenfeld, Adler. Do you know 10 A Who? 11 12 A Can you spel

2 this moment I must assert those rights or risk 3 losing my attorneys. 4 5 6 Q Sure, let's test that answer. A Okay. Q Let's talk about Jane Doe 102, Jane Doe 7 102, , who was represented by 8 s firm, had nothing to do with 9 Rothstein, Rosenfeld, Adler. Do you know 10 A Who? 11 12

re as follows: Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein claims that Defendant Scott Rothstein conspired with other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, for personal greed and enrichment, and engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved, among other things, marketing of non-existent

case are Jeffrey Epstein (via video deposition), Bradley Edwards, Scott Rothstein (via video deposition), and Mr. Edwards' clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe). Source: Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 201.1 Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn 5 EFTA00804794 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDA

implosion of the Rothstein, 20 it docunonts, chat wore sent co us not covering all of the 724. And obviously, your Honor knows from the 2s , 31 Rosenfeld[, Adler urn a trustee was appointed by the bankruptcy court to take control of the firm, 22 materials that you have reviewed much attention was =

RE II Deoksbor 5th and nide it clear to all parties that 10 12 exhibits that. here net disclosed by the end of II For Non-Parties L.M., E.M. 4 Jana Doe 22 1a Deoabor -- and I think it nay have been the 14 De her 22 dace -- I'm not sure about that exact 13 la date -- but exhibits that were no

implosion of the Rothstein, 20 it docunonts, chat wore sent co us not covering all of the 724. And obviously, your Honor knows from the 2s , 31 Rosenfeld[, Adler urn a trustee was appointed by the bankruptcy court to take control of the firm, 22 materials that you have reviewed much attention was =

question in front of you sight now is • very brief, representing three victims; LH, EM and • what to do about this. Well, we knee one thing. • Jane Doe. /Vat ono housekeeping natter. s lie know there's been absolutely no waiver of 10 No have riled a notion to intervene, which is 10 attorney/cl

r election Improprieties? A Yee. 9 MR. LINK: I change the question as I 1 Q How about your really good friend 10 go. I can do that. 10 Mr. Rosenfeld? 11 BY HR. LINK: II A Sams thing. 12 0 So, Mr. Borger -- 12 0 Same thing. 13 MR. SCAROLA: So as long as the record 13 So these are peopl

riod and say, You 25 know, I should have realized there was something that were being prosecuted on behalf of throe young 1 woman: M., B.N. and Jane Doe. And w➢ will refer to them when I talk to you about them in that ➢ame way, 4 referring to sham by those initial➢ and that 5 pseudonym. 4 Desc

BINET ONE GR.M#004 740697 CMA vs. JEE and Correspondence Summons and Complaint JEE Summons and Complaint Motion, Notice and Order of Dismissal Rosenfeld( vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case #6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case # 80656 C

rder of Dismissal Rosenfeld( vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case #6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case # 80656 CMA Case# 80811 AC Case # 25129 DRAWER TWO: Josefsberg Invoices and Disc 81092 Doe 2 Case # 80119 Doe 3 Case# 80232 EFTA0029

and Fourteenth 10 Amendment right under the U.S. Constitution, 11 therefore I'm going to do that. 12 Q Are you saying because Rothstein, 13 Rosenfeld, Adler was determined to be a criminal 14 enterprise or somebody was running a criminal 15 enterprise out of that law firm, that is the 16 reas

6:30 p.m. This would indicate that c ma e a specs trip ac - tot e office where the deposition was going on and for lack of better terms bumped into Joane Doe #3. This shows that his travels back to that location was intential and in conflict with his probation log. COUNT #6 • Florida State Licensed In

3 4220 43:14 44:8 rights 13:5 25:16 32:7 isk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:10 41:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:13 37:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeld* 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 RPR-CM-RMR-F- 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR-. 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 ules 22:3 25:1 3424 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25

Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs 5 Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. 6 THE COURT: Good morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE COURT: Good morning. 13 MR. WILLI