Epstein Secrets

s and Mr. Cassell have very professional reasons significant personal and that they do not want the e-mails to see the light of the courtroom. See Buckley v. Am. Constitutional Law Found., Inc., 525 U.S. 182, 223, 119 S. Ct. 636, 657, 142 L. Ed. 2d 599 (1999)(4"Sunlight is said to be the best of disin

in reliance on Edwards' previous waiver and agreement to produce the same, these e-mails must be deemed not protected by Edwards' clear waiver. See Jane Doe No. I v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014)(held that Epstein's former counsel had waived the work-product privilege with respect to docum

ause that act is `fairly within the prosecutor's function as an advocate."' Mikko v. City of Atlanta, GA, 857 F.3d 1136, 1142 (10 Cir. 2017), citing Buckley v. Fitzsimmons 509 U.S. 259, 272-73 (1993). 3 EFTA00799966 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 4 of 11 Re

tered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR FINDING OF WAIVER OF WO

ause that act is `fairly within the prosecutor's function as an advocate."' Mikko v. City of Atlanta, GA, 857 F.3d 1136, 1142 (10 Cir. 2017), citing Buckley v. Fitzsimmons 509 U.S. 259, 272-73 (1993). 3 EFTA00601684 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 4 of 11 Re

tered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR FINDING OF WAIVER OF WO