8
Shared Docs
8
Same-Page
8 / 8
Mentions
(USANYS)" C c: I tt II tt Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 21:16:02 +0000 Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe
ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) ifl; (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: Subject: R
2020 17:16 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) < Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe
ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) ‹ > Cc: I < Subject: RE
16 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) )< Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests l< >; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe
ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < =); (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject:
20 17:16 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: <->; Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe
ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < =); (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject:
20 17:16 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) <->; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe
ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: ivIcEnany, John (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE:
To: McEnany, John (USANYS) ; (USANYS) (USANYS) c E> Cc: / Ica Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests C Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe
ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: gc > Subject: RE: Jeffr
6 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests <a> ) <->; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe
ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Muhry does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) <a > ) <-
6 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests <a> ) <->; Understood. Thanks, John. David Jones thought this approach was reasonable, but I'll check with Sarah too. Overall, I don't think we have a ton of precedent for referring folks to anothe
ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhv does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) ) Subject
Entities connected to both David Jones and Touhys

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Touhy
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONMaria Lacerda
PERSONKochevar
PERSONKayleigh McEnany
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSONMaurene
PERSONAlex, Alison
ORGANIZATION
Roberta Kaplan
PERSON
Robbie Kaplan
PERSONRobbie
PERSON
Kaplan Hecker
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON