Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ood that the SORA hearing would be a non-adversarial proceeding with no opportunity or need to present evidence. For the People now to suggest that Appellant erred "as a tactical matter" in trusting the prosecutor's word, and moreover, should be procedurally barred from challenging the lower court's lega
ting and lurid detail — the very Probable Cause Affidavit that the People themselves expressly repudiated as unreliable for purposes of calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA and that was rejected by the Florida prosecutors who handled Appellant's criminal case. Whether this complete abandonment
felony complaint by which the prosecution commenced and was included in the information to which Johnson ultimately pled guilty. See id. at 550-51 (J. McGuire concur.). In contrast, in the instant case, Appellant was never charged with any offense other than two prostitution offenses. Nor was any specific
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ood that the SORA hearing would be a non-adversarial proceeding with no opportunity or need to present evidence. For the People now to suggest that Appellant erred "as a tactical matter" in trusting the prosecutor's word, and moreover, should be procedurally barred from challenging the Court's legally in
a prosecutors who handled Appellant's criminal case and which the People themselves expressly repudiated as unreliable for purposes of calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA. Whether this complete abandonment of the People's previous position and sudden defense of the hearing court's unsupportabl
felony complaint by which the prosecution commenced and was included in the information to which Johnson ultimately pled guilty. See id. at 550-51 (J. McGuire concur.). In contrast, in the instant case, Appellant was never charged with any offense other than two prostitution offenses, nor was any specific
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ood that the SORA hearing would be a non-adversarial proceeding with no opportunity or need to present evidence. For the People now to suggest that Appellant erred "as a tactical matter" in trusting the prosecutor's word, and moreover, should be procedurally barred from challenging the Court's legally in
a prosecutors who handled Appellant's criminal case and which the People themselves expressly repudiated as unreliable for purposes of calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA. Whether this complete abandonment of the People's previous position and sudden defense of the hearing court's unsupportabl
felony complaint by which the prosecution commenced and was included in the information to which Johnson ultimately pled guilty. See id. at 550-51 (J. McGuire concur.). In contrast, in the instant case, Appellant was never charged with any offense other than two prostitution offenses, nor was any specific
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (45)
Entities connected to both Appellant and J. McGuire
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON34 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON20 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
New York
LOCATION15 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
New York City
LOCATION9 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
Samantha Power
PERSON8 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
MW
M. Weinberg
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
Criminal Term
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
TY
Typeface
PERSON6 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
DIGITAL-SUBMISSION COMPLIANCE
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
SM
Sandra Lynn Musumeci
PERSON6 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
Felony Solicitation for Prostitution
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Appellant·2 w/ J.
Pataki
PERSON6 w/ Appellant·2 w/ J.
Fresh Del Monte Produce N.V.
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Appellant·2 w/ J.
the Appellate Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
PM
People v. Mingo
PERSON3 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.
the District Attorney's
LOCATION3 w/ Appellant·3 w/ J.