Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ood that the SORA hearing would be a non-adversarial proceeding with no opportunity or need to present evidence. For the People now to suggest that Appellant erred "as a tactical matter" in trusting the prosecutor's word, and moreover, should be procedurally barred from challenging the lower court's lega
ting and lurid detail — the very Probable Cause Affidavit that the People themselves expressly repudiated as unreliable for purposes of calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA and that was rejected by the Florida prosecutors who handled Appellant's criminal case. Whether this complete abandonment
mes Unit. See A.89-A.90 (Tr.). At the invitation of the District Attorney's Office, counsel for Appellant followed up that meeting by providing for the People's review additional evidence from the Florida investigation to supplement the relatively limited materials provided by the Board. See A.89-A.90 (Tr.)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ood that the SORA hearing would be a non-adversarial proceeding with no opportunity or need to present evidence. For the People now to suggest that Appellant erred "as a tactical matter" in trusting the prosecutor's word, and moreover, should be procedurally barred from challenging the Court's legally in
a prosecutors who handled Appellant's criminal case and which the People themselves expressly repudiated as unreliable for purposes of calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA. Whether this complete abandonment of the People's previous position and sudden defense of the hearing court's unsupportabl
the Sex Crimes Unit rather than the more junior Assistant District Attorney originally assigned to the matter -- advised the Court that based upon the People's investigation and interaction with Florida authorities, the Board materials could not be relied upon in full and therefore did not support a Level
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ood that the SORA hearing would be a non-adversarial proceeding with no opportunity or need to present evidence. For the People now to suggest that Appellant erred "as a tactical matter" in trusting the prosecutor's word, and moreover, should be procedurally barred from challenging the Court's legally in
a prosecutors who handled Appellant's criminal case and which the People themselves expressly repudiated as unreliable for purposes of calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA. Whether this complete abandonment of the People's previous position and sudden defense of the hearing court's unsupportabl
mes Unit. See A.89-A.90 (Tr.). At the invitation of the District Attorney's Office, counsel for Appellant followed up that meeting by providing for the People's review additional evidence from the Florida investigation to supplement the relatively limited materials provided by the Board. See A.83, A.89-A.90
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (53)
Entities connected to both Appellant and the People's
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON34 w/ Appellant·6 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON20 w/ Appellant·6 w/ the
New York
LOCATION15 w/ Appellant·6 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION9 w/ Appellant·6 w/ the
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·6 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
Samantha Power
PERSON8 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION8 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
MW
M. Weinberg
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
Legislature
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
Criminal Term
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
DIGITAL-SUBMISSION COMPLIANCE
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
New York State
LOCATION4 w/ Appellant·5 w/ the
SM
Sandra Lynn Musumeci
PERSON6 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
TY
Typeface
PERSON6 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the
Felony Solicitation for Prostitution
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Appellant·2 w/ the
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON5 w/ Appellant·3 w/ the