Epstein Secrets

]he only factual issue in the case was whether petitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to facilitate her practice of prostitution. . .); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence . . . that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive."). There is no basis for co

of New York for in excess of half of each year, visiting his mother and brother, meeting with business associates, and negotiating the purchase of the Gosman Estate — Epstein made 65 separate trips to Florida in 2004 and 20058. There trips are reflected on the flight records previously provided to you. We are not reproduc

T]he only factual issue in the case was whether paitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to facilitate her practice of prostitution. . .); Cleveland I United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence .. . that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive."). There is no basis for conc

of New York for in excess of half of each year, visiting his mother and brother, meeting with business associates, and negotiating the purchase of the Gosman Estate — Epstein made 65 separate trips to Florida in 2004 and 20058. There trips are reflected on the flight records previously provided to you. We are not reproduc

T]he only factual issue in the case was whether petitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to facilitate her practice of prostitution.. .); Cleveland I United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive."). There is no basis for concl

of New York for in excess of half of each year, visiting his mother and brother, meeting with business associates, and negotiating the purchase of the Gosman Estate — Epstein made 65 separate trips to Florida in 2004 and 20058. $ There trips are reflected on the flight records previously provided to you. We are not reprod