Epstein Secrets

]he only factual issue in the case was whether petitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to facilitate her practice of prostitution. . .); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence . . . that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive."). There is no basis for co

tervention in this matter; we also believe that the misleading and inaccurate reports of the PBPD may well have affected how you view the A copy of the unredacted Police Report, to which we make reference throughout the letter, is provided at Tab 1. Note, pages 81 - 87 are taken from the redacted Police Report because we do

T]he only factual issue in the case was whether paitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to facilitate her practice of prostitution. . .); Cleveland I United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence .. . that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive."). There is no basis for conc

tervention in this matter; we also believe that the misleading and inaccurate reports of the PBPD may well have affected how you view the A copy of the unredacted Police Report, to which we make reference throughout the letter, is provided at Tab I. Note, pages 81 - 87 are taken from the redacted Police Report because we do

T]he only factual issue in the case was whether petitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to facilitate her practice of prostitution.. .); Cleveland I United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive."). There is no basis for concl

tervention in this matter; we also believe that the misleading and inaccurate reports of the PBPD may well have affected how you view the A copy of the unredacted Police Report, to which we make reference throughout the letter, is provided at Tab I. Note, pages 81 - 87 are taken from the redacted Police Report because we do