Epstein Secrets

D FOR PALM BEACHCOUNTY, FLORIDA CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, CASENO.: 50-2019-CA-014681-XXXX-MB Publisher of THE PALMBEACH POST, DIVISION: AG Plaintiff, DAVE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, Florida; SHARON R. BOCK, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendants. MOTION OF PLAIN

M NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Filing# 125411406 E-Filed 04/22/2021 11:42:00 AM CA FLORIO A HOLDINGS, LLC, Publisher of THE PALM ]JliACH POST, Plaintiff, V. DA VE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, Florida; SHARON R. BOCK, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palin Beach County, Florida, Defendants. IN THE CI

ndment right to report information informing the public about the operation of the criminal justice system. See Va. Pharmacy Bd., 425 U.S. at 756-57; Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1283; Richmond Newspapers, 448 U.S. at 596 (“the 5 No-knock warrants have been banned in Florida since 1994. See Slate y. Bamber, 630 So

(“Where a speaker exists . . . the protection afforded [by the First Amendment] is to the communication, to its source and to its recipients both.”), Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1283 n.12 (11th Cir. 2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers and

aintiff, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 50-2019-CAj014681-XXXX-MB Div,: AG v. DAVE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, Florida; SHARON R. BOCK, as Clerk and Comptroller ofPalm Beach County, Florida, Defendants. FIRST AMENDED CO

LM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, Publisher of THE P AIM BEACH POST, Plaintiff, V. CASE NO.: 50-2019-CA~014681-XX.XX-MB Div_.: AG DA VE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, Florida; SHARON R. BOCK, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendants. FIRST AMEN

) (“Where a speaker exists ... the protection afforded [by the First Amendment] is to the communication, to its source and to its recipients both.”); Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1283 n.12 (11th Cir. 2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers and

se Clipped By. reiter;.m Sat',_ Apr 22, 2017 CopY,right'© 2019 Newspapers:com. All Rig_hts Res_erved. I • , Downloaded on Nov 11, __ 2019 CA/Aronberg..-000172 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM The Palm Beach Post REALNEWSSTARTSHERE r i Delays in Epstein c

(“Where a speaker exists . . . the protection afforded [by the First Amendment] is to the communication, to its source and to its recipients both.”); Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1283 n. 12 (11th Cir. 2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers an

the right to order release of grand jury materials if such would further justice as defined in Fla. Stat. section 905.27. CA Fla. Holdings, LLC v. Aronberg, 360 So. 3d 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023). Therefore, this court has inherent authority to release the Epstein grand jury materials in addition to the st

“Where a speaker exists . . . the protection afforded [by the First Amendment] is to the communication, to its source and to its recipients both.”); Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1283 n.12 (11th Cir. 2001) (“The Supreme Court has recognized that the First Amendment offers protection to both speakers a