3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
in to discovery requests in civil litigation. 3 EFTA00103817 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page 4 of 9 See United States v. Avenatti, No. (SI) I9-CR-373 (PGG), 2020 WL 86768, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020). But Rule 17(c) subpoenas are not tools of discovery. Nixon, 418 U.S. at 698
ally impeaching statements `ripen into evidentiary material. . . only if and when the witness testifies at trial...." (citation omitted)). See also Avenatti, 2020 WL 86768, at *6 (rejecting the argument that the defendant needed the recordings in question prior to trial in order "to demonstrate witnesses
States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 4/27/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell seeks an order authorizing a subpoena pursuant to Rule 17(c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proce
in to discovery requests in civil litigation. 3 EFTA00104688 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page 4 of 9 See United States v. Avenatti, No. (SI) I9-CR-373 (PGG), 2020 WL 86768, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020). But Rule 17(c) subpoenas are not tools of discovery. Nixon, 418 U.S. at 698
ally impeaching statements `ripen into evidentiary material. . . only if and when the witness testifies at trial...." (citation omitted)). See also Avenatti, 2020 WL 86768, at *6 (rejecting the argument that the defendant needed the recordings in question prior to trial in order "to demonstrate witnesses
States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 4/27/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell seeks an order authorizing a subpoena pursuant to Rule 17(c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proce
in to discovery requests in civil litigation. 3 EFTA00081407 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page 4 of 9 See United States v. Avenatti, No. (SI) I9-CR-373 (PGG), 2020 WL 86768, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020). But Rule 17(c) subpoenas are not tools of discovery. Nixon, 418 U.S. at 698
ally impeaching statements `ripen into evidentiary material. . . only if and when the witness testifies at trial...." (citation omitted)). See also Avenatti, 2020 WL 86768, at *6 (rejecting the argument that the defendant needed the recordings in question prior to trial in order "to demonstrate witnesses
States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 4/27/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell seeks an order authorizing a subpoena pursuant to Rule 17(c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proce
Entities connected to both Michael Avenatti and ALISON J. NATHAN

Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
David Boies
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATIONFederal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATION
Cynthia Nixon
PERSON
William Barr
PERSON
Brady
PERSON
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON
Giglio
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON