Epstein Secrets

he facts to footnotes. In pertinent part, Epstein's affidavit alleged the following as probable cause for the filing of the complaint: I filed the Action against Rothstein and Edwards because, based on the facts described below and in the Summary Judgment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my o

A. Imo Tonja Haddad Coleman -18- EFTA00612500 W. Chester Brewer, Jr. W. Chester Brewer. Jr P.A. Tonja Haddad Coleman, P.A. Bradley J. Edwards Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fred Haddad Fred Haddad, P.A. Mark Nurik Law Offices of Mark S. Nurik Jack Goldberger Atterburv. Goldberger & Weiss.

(including, without limitation, witnesses) for services provided to or for the benefit of you, LM, EW, Jane Doe and/or M) in connection with this Action, or any other matters pertaining to or involving Jeffrey Epstein. Include in your response the format in which any such promises, contracts, agreem

nts, whether written, oral or in electronic format (including, without limitation, in emails, texts or other digital or electronic format) that you, Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman PL and/or any other law firm through which you have provided legal services and/or any other la er and

forth my background as a mediator to provide context for the comments that follow, and to demonstrate that my perspective on the settlement of this Action is rooted in significant experience in the resolution of complex litigation. As described below, this Action presented complicated legal, factual,

case against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of survivors in 2016. They have also represented survivors in civil litigation against Epstein's Estate, see Fanner v. Indyke, et at (I:19-cv-10474); Fanner v. Indyke, et at (No. 1:19-cv-10475); Helm v. Indyke, et aL (1:19-cv-10476); Bryant v. Indyke, et al. (No.