Epstein Secrets

lawsuit. In pertinent part, Epstein's affidavit summarized the following as probable cause for the filing of his suit against Edwards: I filed the Action against Rothstein and Edwards because, based on the facts described below and in the Summary Judgment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my o

n a cause of action for abuse of process, arising out of a fraudulent Ponzi scheme perpetrated by attorneys and staff of the law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler ("RRA"), where Edwards was a partner who prosecuted actions against Epstein which were marketed by RRA to investors with the promise of m

the facts that existed at the time I filed suit, as set forth below and more fully in my Summary Judgment Motion. 1 EFTA00313265 5. I filed the Action against Rothstein and Edwards because, based on the facts described below and in the Summary Judgment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my o

gment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my original Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm (the "Ponzi Scheme

he facts to footnotes. In pertinent part, Epstein's affidavit alleged the following as probable cause for the filing of the complaint: I filed the Action against Rothstein and Edwards because, based on the facts described below and in the Summary Judgment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my o

4) fraud. Epstein's complaint set forth details of a Pont scheme that Edwards, Rothstein, and others perpetrated through their law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). (It 1-36).' The scheme included fraudulent promises to investors of multi-million dollar recoveries against Epstein from v

on the facts that existed at the time I filed suit, as set forth below and more fully in my Summary Judgment Motion. EFTA00313643 5. I filed the Action against Rothstein and Edwards because, based on the facts described below and in the Summary Judgment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my o

gment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my original Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm (the "Ponzi Scheme

he same, based on the facts that existed at the time I filed suit, as set forth below and more fully in my Summary Judgment Motion. 5. I filed the Action against Rothstein and Edwards because, based on the facts described below and in the Summary Judgment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my o

gment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my original Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law Finn (the "Ponzi Scheme