Epstein Secrets

. And, of course, we are not waiving any right to seek other production. Paul Cassell Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah EFTA00205507 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message -

munications but not Epstein's for a number of the emails. (Epstein improperly withheld some of the e-mails without telling us, such as e-mails from Lillian Sanchez.) So turning over what Epstein said certainly can't be regarded as privileged. And the e- mails regarding the NPA are clearly within the scope of dis

. And, of course, we are not waiving any right to seek other production. Paul Cassell Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 14OO East, Room 1O1 Salt Lake City, UT 8411

munications but not Epstein's for a number of the emails. (Epstein improperly withheld some of the e-mails without telling us, such as e-mails from Lillian Sanchez.) So turning over what Epstein said certainly can't be regarded as privileged. And the e- mails regarding the NPA are clearly within the scope of dis

your position on such a motion? Thank you in advance for your position. Paul Cassell, Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is int

ke the position that you can withhold the other half of the U.S. Attorney's correspondence, correspondence between the Department and Ken Starr and Lillian Sanchez on behalf of Epstein, and information about role in the Epstein case. In short, we understand you to be asserting a blanket position that you can w

ed to respond to give their position." Thanks you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Paul Cassell, Co-Counsel for Jane Doe Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 8411

ke the position that you can withhold the other half of the U.S. Attorney's correspondence, correspondence between the Department and Ken Starr and Lillian Sanchez on behalf of Epstein, and information about role in the Epstein case. In short, we understand you to be asserting a blanket position that you can w

ed to respond to give their position." Thanks you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Paul Cassell, Co-Counsel for Jane Doe Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 8411

erstand you to take the position that you can withhold the other half of the U.S. Attorney's correspondence, correspondence ment and Ken Starr and Lillian Sanchez on behalf of Epstein, and information about role in the Epstein case. In short, we understand you to be asserting a blanket position a you can with

your position on such a motion? Thank you in advance for your position. Paul Cassell, Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=S7&name=Cassell Paul CO

ke the position that you can withhold the other half of the U.S. Attorney's correspondence, correspondence between the Department and Ken Starr and Lillian Sanchez on behalf of Epstein, and information about Bruce Reinhart's role in the Epstein case. In short, we understand you to be asserting a blanket positio

ed to respond to give their position." Thanks you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Paul Cassell, Co-Counsel for Jane Doe Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 http://www.law.utah.edu/profilesidefault.asp?PersonlD=57&namerCassell Paul CO

ke the position that you can withhold the other half of the U.S. Attorney's correspondence, correspondence between the Department and Ken Starr and Lillian Sanchez on behalf of Epstein, and information about Bruce Reinhart's role in the Epstein case. In short, we understand you to be asserting a blanket positio

ed to respond to give their position." Thanks you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Paul Cassell, Co-Counsel for Jane Doe Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all

ke the position that you can withhold the other half of the U.S. Attorney's correspondence, correspondence between the Department and Ken Starr and Lillian Sanchez on behalf of Epstein, and information about role in the Epstein case. In short, we understand you to be asserting a blanket position that you ca

ed to respond to give their position." Thanks you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Paul Cassell, Co-Counsel for Jane Doe Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law SJ. Quinney College of law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 Salt Lake Cit UT 84112-0

her half of the C1.S. Attorney's correspondence, correspondence between the Department and Ken 08-80736-CZ-MARRA P-013952 EFTA00230470 Starr and Lillian Sanchez on behalf of Epstein, and information about Bruce Reinhart's role in the Epstein case. In short. we understand you to be asserting a blanket positio