Epstein Secrets

1094. HI. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Peck's sentence. C.A.8 (lowa),2007. U.S. Peck 496 F.3d 885 END OF DOCUMENT CI 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Full&prft=HTMLE&fri=_top&mt=F... 2/27/2008 EFTA0019204

Documents: Images: 0 PROTECT ACT ADDS 3559(E) The material accompanying this summary is subject to copyright. Usage is governed by contract with Thomson. West and their affiliates. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLE&destination=atp&sv=Full... 2/27/2008 EFTA00192068 Page 2

)(4XB); Fed.Rules Cr.Proc.Rule 32(cX1), 18 U.S.C.A.; U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(bX3), 18 U.S.C.A. •373 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Before GUY and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges; and LAWSON, District Judge.' FN' The Honorable David M. Lawson, United States District Judge f

cted." Bloomberg (11/20, Murphy), the Record (11/20, Greig), Bleeping Computer (11/20, Gatlan), TechCrunch (11/20, Franceschi), the Register (11/20, Thomson), Law 360 (11/20, Scharf), KBTX (CBS-3) (11/20, Surette), UPI (11/20, Heuer), Axios (11/20, Sabin), Cointelegraph (11/20, Coghlan), and CYBERSCOOP

Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act and the nominations of Anthony J. Brindisi and Elizabeth C. Coombe both to be a United States District Judge for the Northern District of New York Sarah Morgan Davenport to be United States District Judge for the District of New Mexico Tiffany Rene Johnson to be United States Distr

Quarles, supra. The decree appealed from will accordingly be reversed. Reversed. C.A.4 1943. Spence'. Cole 137 F.2d 71 END OF DOCUMENT C 2007 Thomson/west. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?vr=2.0&sv=Full&rs=WLW7.11&prft=... 12/27/2007 EFTA001919

f while in custody of city police and for alleged ille- gal transportation of his person into an- other state. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Kloeb, J., rendered judgment dismissing complaint with prejudice, and plaintiff appealed. The Court of Appeals, held that order dismissi