Epstein Secrets

'clear and convincing' proof that the underlying order was violated." Howard Johnson Co. v. IChitnani, 892 F.2d 1512, 1516 (11th Cir. 1990) (citing Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513, 1525 (11th Cir. 1984); Piambino v. Bestline Prods., Inc., 645 F. Supp. 1210, 1213 (S.D. Fla. 1986)). "However, once the

Walter Res., Inc. v. Ina Union, etc., 609 F.2d 165,168 (5th Cir. 1980); 3 EFTA00793959 Case 09-34791-R BR Doc 6366 Filed 04/20/18 Page 4 of 8 Newman, 740 F.2d at 1524). If, after notice and an evidentiary hearing, the Court makes a finding of civil contempt, the Court will consider imposing "com

Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6366 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 8 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 19, 2018. Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA w

s is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right of access creates 'All documents filed conventionally shall henceforth be filed directly

v. Noriega, 752 F. Supp. 1037, 1040 (S.D. Fla.1990). For example, courts may look to see whether the records sought are for illegitimate purposes. Newman, 696 F.2d at 803. Likewise, the Court may consider whether "the press has already been permitted substantial access to the contents of the records."

led directly with the Office of the Clerk in West Palm Beach, Florida. The parties shall not file documents conventionally in any other division of the Southern District of Florida. 1 EFTA00221152 Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 07x'16%2008 Page 2 of 3 a presumption in favor of openne

czak case. Insider trading aficionados may remember that when Judge Sullivan was a trial judge in Manhattan, the 2nd Circuit found in 2016's U.S. v. Newman that he failed to instruct jurors that the government must prove tipsters received a personal benefit. In the Blaszczak case, prosecutors indicted

n trust. A majority of the complaints against Epstein have been filed in three separate courts in New York. Ten are being tried in federal court in the Southern District of New York, the same venue where Epstein was being tried on criminal charges prior to taking his own life in August. Six of the ten have been file

ds, a type of restitution; "[c]riminal forfeiture is . . . separate from restitution, which serves an entirely different purpose." United States v. Newman, 659 F.3d 1235, 1241 (9th Cir. 2011). Among other differences between restitution and forfeiture, only the criminal defendant is subject to restit

of any certain set of facts, other than whether a charging document was ever filed against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. And while this Office remains willing to cooperate, cooperation does not mean agreeing to facts that are not relevant to the resolution