Epstein Secrets

ng of motions and a brief by the Guardian in appellate proceedings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to

.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. C 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspeprft=1-ITML

ng of motions and a brief by the Guardian in appellate proceedings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 1.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 Eld at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to ap

ppeal in deciding whether to grant stay include moving party's likelihood of success on merits, and likelihood of harm should stay not be granted. West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(f). [31 Child Custody 76D etzz9OS 76D Child Custody 76DX111 Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk905 k. Transfer of Cause and

ng of motions and a brief by the Guardian in appellate proceedings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick. 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to

ppeal in deciding whether to grant stay include moving party's likelihood of success on merits, and likelihood of harm should stay not be granted. West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(0. (3) Child Custody 76D €:=7905 76D Child Custody 76DXfli Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk905 k. Transfer of Cause and P