Epstein Secrets

nsealOn Services Group Tinned (No 9766556). incorporated in England 6 Weiss with a registered °Noes el 1st Root Central Square SOMA. Orchard Street, Newcastle Upon Lyn. NEI 3A2, United IGngdom I ConectionS PLC (Company No: 03422873 / FCA No' 756925) and Magmas Sennces LW (Company No: 02982925/ FCA No:

United States (2014)*5 ri U Elt3CSC C?"' - cuv A." vs t. PIZCisalt‘if.-Lt,-ii Pr A December so, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. effort Department of„ Justices Nia with Rfla

ng Isolation Police / Government - Queensland - America - Port Pirie Newcastle Hotel, Port Pirie / Under cover police officer - Refer to file 2007 Newcastle Bouncer under cover police officer Refer to Stage 3 Police Targeting Refer to Stage 1C Fraudulent Activity / Rise in Utility accounts / Electricit

ovember 30, 2018. Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's la and his limited 2008 state plea.

e, I am no shortlisted. They have other candidates that match better their expectations as they wrote. Not a surprise as I said, there is only Newcastle left now, probably the same response coming soon... So I need to reconcentrate here and refocus. Hope you are having a great morning my love. T

es v. United States (201,55 40 f-1 A (— 5 L \ ""‘ piws-ti N)EiCri A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's ' and his limited 2008 state plea. Th

ed the call in its pre-indictment proffers, that argument fails for the reasons. dis- cussed in Part III(B), infra. At the risk of carting coal to Newcastle, we add that a prospective waiver will very rarely be warranted in extrajudicial disclos- ure cases. Courts have generally allowed prospective wai

ney General or any office under his direction.'" Id. at *2 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6)). For these reasons, the Court should deny the motion of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 to discover and use the plea negotiation letters as evidence. PART II MR. EPSTEIN'S PLEA NEGOTIATIONS ARE PRIVILEGED AND NOT DISCO